Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641930›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2019

Comparative of

Fereydoon Abedi Gaballu, Soheil Abbaspour-Ravasjani, Behzad Mansoori, Reza Yekta, Hamed Hamishehkar, Ali Mohammadi, Gholamreza Dehghan, Behrooz Shokouhi, Shaho Ghahremani Dehbokri, Behzad Baradaran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024
    Article
  7. NovelHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tumor Cell-Derived Exosomal miR-770 Inhibits M2 Macrophage PolarizationFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fereydoon Abedi GaballuImmounology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Soheil Abbaspour-RavasjaniDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Behzad MansooriImmounology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Reza YektaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Hamed HamishehkarDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali MohammadiImmounology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Gholamreza DehghanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Behrooz ShokouhiDepartment of Pathology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shaho Ghahremani DehbokriImmounology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Behzad BaradaranImmounology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tabriz · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erlotinib (ELT) as a small molecule with poor solubility, poor bioavailability, and instability in gastrointestinal environment, has been considered as a therapeutic agent for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) therapy through oral administration. In the present study, ELT-liposome and ELT-NLCs were successfully prepared and characterized by assessment of the particle size, zeta potential (ZP), polydispersity index (PDI), encapsulation efficiency (EE), and drug loading (DL). DAPI staining and Flow cytometry techniques were employed to probe anticancer activities of the optimal formulations. The obtained results indicated that the average size of optimized ELT-NLCs was 109 ± 2 nm, while the optimal formulation of ELT-liposome was 130 ± 4 nm. In addition, the values of EE, DL, and cellular uptake were higher in ELT-NLCs than ELT-liposome. Moreover, the stability of ELT-NLCs and ELT-liposome were not significantly changed (

Indexed as

A549 cellsErlotinibLiposomeNLCs

Identifiers

PMID32641930
PMCPMC6934956
OpenAlexW2956114404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.