Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641817›Full record

ArticleNature2020

Potential for large-scale CO

David J Beerling, Euripides P Kantzas, Mark R Lomas, Peter Wade, Rafael M Eufrasio, Phil Renforth, Binoy Sarkar, M Grace Andrews, Rachael H James, Christopher R Pearce and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrated thermal and phytoremediation of agricultural soils impacted by PFAS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Enhanced rock weathering has greater promise as a sustainable farming practice than a COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced weathering of lizardite-rich sand in seawater: effects of pH and COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

David J BeerlingLeverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. d.j.beerling@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-4314
Euripides P KantzasLeverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mark R LomasLeverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Peter WadeLeverhulme Centre for Climate Change Mitigation, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Rafael M EufrasioAdvanced Resource Efficiency Centre, Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Phil RenforthSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-9947
Binoy SarkarLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4196-1225
M Grace AndrewsSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Rachael H JamesSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Christopher R PearceNational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-2341
Jean-Francois MercureGlobal Systems Institute, Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-9200
Hector PollittCambridge Centre for Energy, Environment and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0507-3220
Philip B HoldenEnvironment, Earth and Ecosystems, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-0062
Neil R EdwardsCambridge Centre for Energy, Environment and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-8804
Madhu KhannaDepartment of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-4451
Lenny KohAdvanced Resource Efficiency Centre, Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Shaun QueganSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Hicks Building, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nick F PidgeonUnderstanding Risk Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-0398
Ivan A JanssensResearch Group Plants and Ecosystems, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-1787
James HansenEarth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Steven A BanwartGlobal Food and Environment Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-6678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced silicate rock weathering (ERW), deployable with croplands, has potential use for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalGoalsAtmosphereBrazilCarbon DioxideChinaEnvironmental PolicyGeologic SedimentsGlobal WarmingIndiaIronMiningPoliticsProbabilitySilicatesbasaltCarbon DioxideIronSilicatesSteel

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.