Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641739›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021

Ethnic variation in prostate cancer detection: a feasibility study for use of the Stockholm3 test in a multiethnic U.S. cohort.

Hari T Vigneswaran, Andrea Discacciati, Peter H Gann, Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund, Michael R Abern

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04583072 (SEPTA Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04583072 completednot on this map

SEPTA Trial: Stockholm3 Validation Study in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort for ProsTAte Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2023Enrolled2,152ConditionsProstate Cancer (Diagnosis)ArmsThe Stockholm3 test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hari T VigneswaranDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. Hvignes2@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-2655
Andrea DiscacciatiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Sweden.
Peter H GannDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Henrik GrönbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Sweden.
Martin EklundDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5032-5266
Michael R AbernDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Stockholm3 test improves Gleason Grade Group ≥2 (GG ≥ 2) prostate cancer (PC) detection, however it has not been evaluated in an American cohort where clinical practice patterns and ethnicity differ. We aimed to identify subgroups within a Stockholm population with PC risk profiles matching American ethnicity-specific subgroups and compare the detection of PC and describe Stockholm3 performance within these subgroups.

methodsAll men age 49-70 years presenting for prostate biopsies were evaluated at UIC from 2016 to 2019, as well as men in Stockholm from 2012 to 2014 in the STHLM3 study. Propensity scores (PS) were estimated for each person using logistic regression for age, PSA, prostate volume, family history of PC, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use, and prior biopsy. 3:1 PS matching was performed for Stockholm to Chicago ethnicity-specific cohorts and odds ratios (OR) were computed to compare detection of GG ≥ 2 PC between groups.

results504 Chicago men and 6980 Stockholm men were included. In African American (AA) men, 51% had GG ≥ 2 PC detected, while in risk-matched Stockholm men, 34% had GG ≥ 2 PC detected (OR: 2.1, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in GG ≥ 2 PC detected when matching Stockholm men to non-Hispanic Caucasian men (31% vs. 24%, OR: 0.7, p = 0.30) or Hispanic Caucasian men (31% vs. 27%, OR: 1.2, p = 0.42). The AUC for the Stockholm3 test of the matched Stockholm cohorts for AA, non-Hispanic Caucasian, and Hispanic Caucasian men was 0.85, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively.

conclusionsUsing statistical techniques to simulate a multi-ethnic Chicago cohort within the STHLM3 population, we found an excess risk of GG ≥ 2 PC among AA men. Our hypothesis that the Stockholm3 may have good predictive value in a multiethnic cohort is strengthened, and that recalibration to at least AA men seems likely to be needed to obtain well-calibrated predictions.

Indexed as

EthnicityAgedBiopsyFeasibility StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.