Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641623›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020

Mycological isolation from animal enclosures and environments in National Wildlife Rescue Centre and National Zoo, Malaysia.

Sharina Omar, Fathiah Aqilah Jalaludin, Jacqueline Meikwei Yee, Zubaidah Kamarudin, Kavitha Jayaseelan, Aina Nazurah Mohd Khlubi, Yusuf Lekko Madaki, Hasdi Hassan, Mat Naim Ramli, Rahmat Topani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. First Documentation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sharina OmarFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Fathiah Aqilah JalaludinFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jacqueline Meikwei YeeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Zubaidah KamarudinNational Wildlife Rescue Centre (NWRC), Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia (PERHILITAN), 35600 Sungkai, Perak, Malaysia.
Kavitha JayaseelanZoo Negara (National Zoo), Hulu Kelang, 68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Aina Nazurah Mohd KhlubiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Yusuf Lekko MadakiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hasdi HassanNational Wildlife Rescue Centre (NWRC), Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia (PERHILITAN), 35600 Sungkai, Perak, Malaysia.
Mat Naim RamliZoo Negara (National Zoo), Hulu Kelang, 68000 Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Rahmat TopaniEx-Situ Conservation Division, Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia (PERHILITAN), KM 10 Jalan Cheras, 56100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Azlan Che-AmatFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to provide a baseline of fungal composition in the captive wildlife environment to better understand their role in overall wildlife health. The objectives were to identify species of fungi existing within wildlife animal enclosures and their environment at the National Wildlife Rescue Centre (NWRC) and the National Zoo, Malaysia and to describe their medical and veterinary importance. Samples of air, wall or floor swab, enrichment swab and soil were taken from the animal enclosures, exercise yard and enrichments at NWRC and National Zoo respectively. All samples including those pre-treated samples were plated onto Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA). Numerous fungi were grown on all sampling SDA plates regardless by either single or multiple growth. Samples of air in both NWRC and National Zoo had the highest growth of Penicillium spp. with a prevalence of 31.2% and 83.7% respectively. Samples of swab from the wall, floor and enrichments were predominantly by Candida spp. (42.6%) in NWRC and Penicillium spp. (41.6%) in the National Zoo. Prevalence of multiple fungi isolated from the soil samples in NWRC were 57.9% and yeast species was the most common in National Zoo with a prevalence of 88.9%. Overall, 29 and 8 isolates were found in both samples from the NWRC and National Zoo with a predominant species of potential zoonotic fungi have been identified in both premises. The expected fungus Aspergillus spp. was not isolated in all samples in NWRC. Prevalent fungal species found in this study are known to cause disease in animals and humans as primary pathogen and also as opportunistic pathogens that may also cause infection. Thus, health safety precautions should be considered particularly in dealing with conservation of endangered wildlife species, along with personnel and public involvements.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAnimalsAnimals, ZooAspergillusCandidaFungiHousing, AnimalMalaysiaPenicilliumZoonosescaptiveenclosurefungalwildlifezoo

Identifiers

PMID32641623
PMCPMC7468073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.