Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020
Multicenter Phase II Study of Cabazitaxel in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: Association of HER2 Expression and M2-Like Tumor-Associated Macrophages with Patient Outcome.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel M2-like tumor associated macrophages-related gene signature for predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Enhancing drug and cell line representations via contrastive learning for improved anti-cancer drug prioritization.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- CLIP-170S is a microtubule +TIP variant that confers resistance to taxanes by impairing drug-target engagement.Developmental cell · 2021Article
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages: A Potential Target for Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- The Distinct Impact of TAM Infiltration on the Prognosis of Patients With Cardia and Non-Cardia Gastric Cancer and Its Association WithFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe examined cabazitaxel, a novel next-generation taxoid, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in a multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients who have progressed on one or more prior therapies for locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease were eligible, and prior taxane therapy was allowed. Taxane-naïve and pretreated cohorts were analyzed independently for efficacy. The primary endpoint for both cohorts was progression-free survival (PFS) using RECIST 1.1, using a Simon's two-stage design (10% significance and 80% power) for both cohorts. Comprehensive molecular annotation included whole exome and bulk RNA sequencing.
resultsFifty-three patients enrolled in the taxane-naïve cohort (Arm A) and 23 patients in the prior-taxane cohort (Arm B), from January 8, 2013, to April 8, 2015: median age 61.7 years (range, 35.5-91.8 years), 66% male, 66% Caucasian. The most common adverse events included neutropenia (17% Arm A and 39% Arm B), fatigue/muscle weakness (13%), and hematuria (12%). In Arm A, the 3-month PFS rate was 28% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17%-42%] and did not meet the prespecified efficacy target. The 3-month PFS rate in Arm B was 35% (95% CI, 16%-57%) and surpassed its efficacy target. HER2 amplification or overexpression was associated with improved disease control (
conclusionsCabazitaxel has modest activity in advanced gastric cancer, including in patients previously treated with taxanes. Her2 amplification/overexpression and M2 high macrophage signature are potential biomarkers for taxane efficacy that warrant further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.