Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641364›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Impact of the herpes zoster vaccination programme on hospitalised and general practice consulted herpes zoster in the 5 years after its introduction in England: a population-based study.

Nick Andrews, Julia Stowe, Galena Kuyumdzhieva, Bersabeh Sile, Ivelina Yonova, Simon de Lusignan, Mary Ramsay, Gayatri Amirthalingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nick AndrewsStatistics Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK nick.andrews@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2069-2684
Julia StoweImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Galena KuyumdzhievaImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Bersabeh SileImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Ivelina YonovaRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK.
Simon de LusignanRoyal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-6810
Mary RamsayImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Gayatri AmirthalingamImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Public Health England, London, UK.
Public Health England · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of herpes zoster vaccination in the 5 years after introduction for 70- to 79-year-olds in England in September 2013.

designPopulation based ecological impact assessment.

settingHospitals covering the whole English population for the period 2008 to 2018 and 293 general practices (GP) for the period 2005 to 2018, in England.

participantsOver the period the population contributed 117·5 million person-years for hospitalisation events and 6.96 million person-years for GP events in individuals aged 60 to 89.

interventionsLive attenuated herpes zoster vaccination (Zostavax), first used on 1 OUTCOME MEASURES: Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) consultation and hospitalisation rates in age-cohorts according to vaccine eligibility. Incidence rate ratios in age-cohorts eligible for vaccination compared with those non-eligible were calculated by Poisson regression. This was used to estimate prevented cases and, along with vaccine coverage, to estimate vaccine effectiveness.

resultsLarge and prolonged reductions in herpes zoster and PHN consultations and hospitalisations were observed in the 5 years post-implementation. For example, in 79 year-olds first eligible in 2013, the incidence rate ratio for consultations 5 years later was 0·65 (95% CI: 0·52 to 0·81). Over the whole period an estimated 40 500 fewer zoster consultations and 1840 fewer zoster hospitalisations occurred because of the vaccination programme. These reductions were consistent with effectiveness in the routine cohorts (vaccinated aged 70) of between 37% (for hospitalised zoster) and 75% (for PHN consultations) and, in catch up cohorts (vaccinated aged 78 to 79) of between 49% (for hospitalised PHN) and 66% (for PHN consultations).

conclusionGiven the clear and sustained impact of herpes zoster vaccination over the 5-year period since introduction, optimising vaccination coverage is important to attain maximum benefit.

Indexed as

General PracticeHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineNeuralgia, PostherpeticAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandHumansMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationVaccinationHerpes Zoster Vaccineepidemiologyhealth economicspaediatric infectious disease & immunisationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32641364
PMCPMC7342826
OpenAlexW3042063735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.