Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641352›Full record

ArticleJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2020

Peer mentoring for professional and personal growth in academic medicine.

Melanie Cree-Green, Anne-Marie Carreau, Shanlee M Davis, Brigitte I Frohnert, Jill L Kaar, Nina S Ma, Natalie J Nokoff, Jane E B Reusch, Stacey L Simon, Kristen J Nadeau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Facilitated Group Mentoring in an Academic Medical Society: Creating Community to Support Well-Being and Professional Development for All Members.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The medical student's case for TikTok.Medical education online · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Medical science educator · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie Cree-GreenPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA Melanie.Green@childrenscolorado.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-1695
Anne-Marie CarreauEndocrinology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Québec, Canada.
Shanlee M DavisPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Brigitte I FrohnertPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jill L KaarPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Nina S MaPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Natalie J NokoffPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jane E B ReuschCenter for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado Denver -Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Stacey L SimonCenter for Women's Health Research, University of Colorado Denver -Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kristen J NadeauPediatric Endocrinology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

The Next Generation of Innovative Cardiovascular Clinical/Translational ResearchersK24HL145076 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NADEAU, KRISTEN JANE · 2019 to 2023
$574k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL145076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentorship is a critical component of career development, particularly in academic medicine. Peer mentorship, which does not adhere to traditional hierarchies, is perhaps more accessible for underrepresented groups, including women and minorities. In this article, we review various models of peer mentorship, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages. Structured peer mentorship groups exist in different settings, such as those created under the auspices of formal career development programs, part of training grant programs, or through professional societies. Social media has further enabled the establishment of informal peer mentorship through participatory online groups, blogs, and forums that provide platforms for peer-to-peer advice and support. Such groups can evolve rapidly to address changing conditions, as demonstrated by physician listserv and Facebook groups related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Peer mentorship can also be found among colleagues brought together through a common location, interest, or goal, and typically these relationships are informal and fluid. Finally, we highlight here our experience with intentional formation of a small peer mentoring group that provides structure and a safe space for professional and social-emotional growth and support. In order to maximize impact and functionality, this model of peer mentorship requires commitment among peers and a more formalized process than many other peer mentoring models, accounting for group dynamics and the unique needs of members. When done successfully, the depth of these mentoring relationships can produce myriad benefits for individuals with careers in academic medicine including, but not limited to, those from underrepresented backgrounds.

Indexed as

Inservice TrainingInterprofessional RelationsMentoringMentorsCareer ChoiceCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsOccupational ExposurePandemicsPeer GroupPhysiciansPhysicians, Womenacademic medical centersbiomedical researcheducation, medicalinterprofessional relations

Identifiers

PMID32641352
PMCPMC7418617
OpenAlexW3041534645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.