Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641336›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Modelling patient flows and resource use within a sexual health clinic through discrete event simulation to inform service redesign.

Syed Mohiuddin, Rebecca Gardiner, Megan Crofts, Peter Muir, Jonathan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Helen Wheeler, William Hollingworth, Paddy J Horner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Syed MohiuddinPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK syed.mohiuddin@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-3392
Rebecca GardinerUnity Sexual Health Clinic, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Megan CroftsUnity Sexual Health Clinic, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Peter MuirSouth West Regional Public Health Laboratory, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan SteerSouth West Regional Public Health Laboratory, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan TurnerSouth West Regional Public Health Laboratory, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Helen WheelerUnity Sexual Health Clinic, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
William HollingworthPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Paddy J HornerPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContinuous improvement in the delivery of health services is increasingly being demanded in the UK at a time when budgets are being cut. Simulation is one approach used for understanding and assessing the likely impact of changes to the delivery of health services. However, little is known about the usefulness of simulation for analysing the delivery of sexual health services (SHSs). We propose a simulation method to model and evaluate patient flows and resource use within an SHS to inform service redesign.

methodsWe developed a discrete event simulation (DES) model to identify the bottlenecks within the Unity SHS (Bristol, UK) and find possible routes for service improvement. Using the example of the introduction of an online service for sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV self-sampling for asymptomatic patients, the impact on patient waiting times was examined as the main outcome measure. The model included data such as patient arrival time, staff availability and duration of consultation, examination and treatment. We performed several sensitivity analyses to assess uncertainty in the model parameters.

resultsWe identified some bottlenecks under the current system, particularly in the consultation and treatment queues for male and female walk-in patients. Introducing the provision of STI and HIV self-sampling alongside existing services decreased the average waiting time (88 vs 128 min) for all patients and reduced the cost of staff time for managing each patient (£72.64 vs £88.74) compared with the current system without online-based self-sampling.

conclusionsThe provision of online-based STI and HIV self-sampling for asymptomatic patients could be beneficial in reducing patient waiting times and the model highlights the complexities of using this to cut costs. Attributing recognition for any improvement requires care, but DES modelling can provide valuable insights into the design of SHSs ensuing in quantifiable improvements. Extension of this method with the collection of additional data and the construction of more informed models seems worthwhile.

Indexed as

Sexual HealthSexually Transmitted DiseasesAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHealth ServicesHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationHIV & AIDSorganisation of health servicessexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID32641336
PMCPMC7348479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.