Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641322›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Mixed-methods study on pharmacies as contraception providers to Kenyan young people: who uses them and why?

Lianne Gonsalves, Kaspar Wyss, Jenny A Cresswell, Michael Waithaka, Peter Gichangi, Adriane Martin Hilber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lianne GonsalvesDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland gonsalvesl@who.int.ORCID 0000-0003-2409-5043
Kaspar WyssSwiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Jenny A CresswellDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-1132
Michael WaithakaInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-9492
Peter GichangiInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9636-165X
Adriane Martin HilberSwiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KEWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to answer two questions: (1) what are the characteristics of young Kenyans aged 18-24 who use contraception obtained at pharmacies, and (2) why are pharmacies appealing sources of contraception? DESIGN AND

settingThis was a mixed-methods study in one peri-urban part of Kwale County, Kenya. Methods included cross-sectional survey (n=740), six focus group discussions, 18 in-depth interviews and 25 key-informant interviews. Quantitative data analysis identified factors pushing young people to pharmacies for modern contraception versus other sources. Qualitative data analysis identified reasons pharmacies were perceived to be appealing to young clients.

participantsParticipants were (1) young people aged 18-24 from the study area, including a subset who had recently purchased contraception from a pharmacy; or (2) pharmacy personnel and pharmacy stakeholders.

resultsAmong surveyed participants who had ever had sexual intercourse and had used modern contraception at last sexual intercourse, 59% obtained it from a pharmacy. In multivariable analysis, participants who used a condom or emergency contraception as well as those living alone were significantly more likely to get contraception from pharmacies. Pharmacies were valued for their convenience, privacy, non-judgmental and personable staff, service speed, as well as predictable and affordable prices.

conclusionsOur findings indicate a high percentage of young people in Coastal Kenya use pharmacies for contraception. Our inclusion of emergency contraception users partially explains this. Pharmacies were perceived to be everything that health facilities are not: fast, private and non-limiting. Policy-makers should recognise the role of pharmacies as contraception providers and look for opportunities to link pharmacies to the public health system. This would create a network of accessible and appealing contraception services for young people.

Indexed as

Contraception, PostcoitalPharmaceutical ServicesPharmaciesAdolescentAdultContraceptionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansKenyaYoung Adultcommunity child healthpublic healthqualitative researchreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID32641322
PMCPMC7348460
OpenAlexW3041841262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.