Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641140›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

Developing pathways for community-led research with big data: a content analysis of stakeholder interviews.

Shira Grayson, Megan Doerr, Joon-Ho Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shira GraysonSage Bionetworks, 2901 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98121, United States of America.
Megan DoerrSage Bionetworks, 2901 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98121, United States of America. megan.doerr@sagebionetworks.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-5978
Joon-Ho YuInstitute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States of America.

Funding

Returning Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Results R00HG007076 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YU, JOON-HO · 2017 to 2019
$730k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG007076NHGRI NIH HHS R00HG007076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBig data (BD) informs nearly every aspect of our lives and, in health research, is the foundation for basic discovery and its tailored translation into healthcare. Yet, as new data resources and citizen/patient-led science movements offer sites of innovation, segments of the population with the lowest health status are least likely to engage in BD research either as intentional data contributors or as 'citizen/community scientists'. Progress is being made to include a more diverse spectrum of research participants in datasets and to encourage inclusive and collaborative engagement in research through community-based participatory research approaches, citizen/patient-led research pilots and incremental research policy changes. However, additional evidence-based policies are needed at the organisational, community and national levels to strengthen capacity-building and widespread adoption of these approaches to ensure that the translation of research is effectively used to improve health and health equity. The aims of this study are to capture uses of BD ('use cases') from the perspectives of community leaders and to identify needs and barriers for enabling community-led BD science.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured key informant interviews with 16 community leaders.

resultsBased on our analysis findings, we developed a BD Engagement Model illustrating the pathways and various forces for and against community engagement in BD research.

conclusionsThe goal of our Model is to promote concrete, transparent dialogue between communities and researchers about barriers and facilitators of authentic community-engaged BD research. Findings from this study will inform the subsequent phases of a multi-phased project with the ultimate aims of organising fundable frameworks and identifying policy options to support BD projects within community settings.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchGender IdentityCapacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMotivationBig Datacommunity engagementcommunity-led researchpatient-led researchpublic healthqualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID32641140
PMCPMC7346420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.