Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641110›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2020

Clinical efficacy and safety in patients treated with teicoplanin with a target trough concentration of 20 μg/mL using a regimen of 12 mg/kg for five doses within the initial 3 days.

Takashi Ueda, Yoshio Takesue, Kazuhiko Nakajima, Kaoru Ichiki, Kaori Ishikawa, Yoshiko Takai, Kumiko Yamada, Toshie Tsuchida, Naruhito Otani, Yoshiko Takahashi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi UedaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan. taka76@hyo-med.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-9050
Yoshio TakesueDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakajimaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Kaoru IchikiDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Kaori IshikawaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Yoshiko TakaiDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Kumiko YamadaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Toshie TsuchidaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Naruhito OtaniDepartment of Public Health, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Yoshiko TakahashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Mika IshiharaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Shingo TakuboDepartment of Pharmacy, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroki IkeuchiDepartment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Motoi UchinoDepartment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Takeshi KimuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA trough concentration (C

methodsPharmacokinetics and adverse events were evaluated in all eligible patients. For clinical efficacy, patients who had bacteremia/complicated MRSA infections were analyzed. The primary endpoint for clinical efficacy was an early clinical response at 72-96 h after the start of therapy. Five dosed of 12 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg was administered as an enhanced or conventional high loading dose regimen, respectively. The C

resultsOverall, 512 patients were eligible, and 76 patients were analyzed for treatment efficacy. The proportion of patients achieving the target C

conclusionA target C

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsTeicoplaninTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsTeicoplaninHypoalbuminemiaLoading doseTeicoplaninTherapeutic drug monitoringTrough concentration

Identifiers

PMID32641110
PMCPMC7341468
OpenAlexW3041660845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.