Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641108›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Unveiling the genetic basis of Sclerotinia head rot resistance in sunflower.

C V Filippi, J E Zubrzycki, J A Di Rienzo, F J Quiroz, A F Puebla, D Alvarez, C A Maringolo, A R Escande, H E Hopp, R A Heinz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and Fine-Mapping of a Novel LocusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Efficacy ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Population and genome-wide association studies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unraveling theFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C V FilippiInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J E ZubrzyckiInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J A Di RienzoFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Ing Agr. Felix Aldo Marrone 746 (5000), Córdoba, Argentina.
F J QuirozEstación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Balcarce, Ruta 226 Km 73.5 (7620), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A F PueblaInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
D AlvarezEstación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Manfredi, Ruta 9 Km 636 (5988), Manfredi, Córdoba, Argentina.
C A MaringoloEstación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Balcarce, Ruta 226 Km 73.5 (7620), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A R EscandeEstación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Balcarce, Ruta 226 Km 73.5 (7620), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
H E HoppInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
R A HeinzInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
N B PaniegoInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
V V LiaInstituto de Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET Nicolas Repetto y Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina. lia.veronica@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-8349
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2011-1365Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PNBIO 1131042Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PNBIO 1131043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSclerotinia sclerotiorum is a necrotrophic fungus that causes Sclerotinia head rot (SHR) in sunflower, with epidemics leading to severe yield losses. In this work, we present an association mapping (AM) approach to investigate the genetic basis of natural resistance to SHR in cultivated sunflower, the fourth most widely grown oilseed crop in the world.

resultsOur association mapping population (AMP), which comprises 135 inbred breeding lines (ILs), was genotyped using 27 candidate genes, a panel of 9 Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers previously associated with SHR resistance via bi-parental mapping, and a set of 384 SNPs located in genes with molecular functions related to stress responses. Moreover, given the complexity of the trait, we evaluated four disease descriptors (i.e, disease incidence, disease severity, area under the disease progress curve for disease incidence, and incubation period). As a result, this work constitutes the most exhaustive AM study of disease resistance in sunflower performed to date. Mixed linear models accounting for population structure and kinship relatedness were used for the statistical analysis of phenotype-genotype associations, allowing the identification of 13 markers associated with disease reduction. The number of favourable alleles was negatively correlated to disease incidence, disease severity and area under the disease progress curve for disease incidence, whereas it was positevily correlated to the incubation period.

conclusionsFour of the markers identified here as associated with SHR resistance (HA1848, HaCOI_1, G33 and G34) validate previous research, while other four novel markers (SNP117, SNP136, SNP44, SNP128) were consistently associated with SHR resistance, emerging as promising candidates for marker-assisted breeding. From the germplasm point of view, the five ILs carrying the largest combination of resistance alleles provide a valuable resource for sunflower breeding programs worldwide.

Indexed as

AllelesAscomycotaChromosome MappingDisease ResistanceGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHelianthusMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideArgentinian germplasmAssociation mappingDisease resistanceSunflower

Identifiers

PMID32641108
PMCPMC7346337
OpenAlexW3042006816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.