Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641053›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

A critical interpretive synthesis of the roles of midwives in health systems.

Cristina A Mattison, John N Lavis, Michael G Wilson, Eileen K Hutton, Michelle L Dion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Suicidality in women nurses: A critical interpretive synthesis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Maximising contributions of midwives in Africa towards achieving MNH targets: Lessons learned.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristina A MattisonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, 1280 Main St. West, HSC-4H26, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. mattisc@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-0690
John N LavisMcMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main St West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.
Michael G WilsonMcMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main St West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.
Eileen K HuttonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, 1280 Main St. West, HSC-4H26, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Michelle L DionDepartment of Political Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, KTH-533, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwives' roles in sexual and reproductive health and rights continues to evolve. Understanding the profession's role and how midwives can be integrated into health systems is essential in creating evidence-informed policies. Our objective was to develop a theoretical framework of how political system factors and health systems arrangements influence the roles of midwives within the health system.

methodsA critical interpretive synthesis was used to develop the theoretical framework. A range of electronic bibliographic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health database, HealthSTAR, Health Systems Evidence, MEDLINE and Web of Science) was searched through to 14 May 2020 as were policy and health systems-related and midwifery organisation websites. A coding structure was created to guide the data extraction.

resultsA total of 4533 unique documents were retrieved through electronic searches, of which 4132 were excluded using explicit criteria, leaving 401 potentially relevant records, in addition to the 29 records that were purposively sampled through grey literature. A total of 100 documents were included in the critical interpretive synthesis. The resulting theoretical framework identified the range of political and health system components that can work together to facilitate the integration of midwifery into health systems or act as barriers that restrict the roles of the profession.

conclusionsAny changes to the roles of midwives in health systems need to take into account the political system where decisions about their integration will be made as well as the nature of the health system in which they are being integrated. The theoretical framework, which can be thought of as a heuristic, identifies the core contextual factors that governments can use to best leverage their position when working to improve sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Indexed as

MidwiferySexual HealthFemaleGovernmentGovernment ProgramsHumansPoliticsPregnancyCritical interpretive synthesisHealth systemsMidwiferyPolitical systemsSexual and reproductive health and rights

Identifiers

PMID32641053
PMCPMC7346500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.