ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020
A critical interpretive synthesis of the roles of midwives in health systems.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A critical interpretive synthesis of migrants' experiences of the Australian health system.International journal for equity in health · 2023Pooled it
- Suicidality in women nurses: A critical interpretive synthesis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Competency Goals in Midwifery Master's Programs in Germany and Selected OECD Countries: Comparison of Stakeholder Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Midwives' experiences and perceptions on the use of the Labour Care Guide: A qualitative study.Curationis · 2026Article
- Work Experiences of Male Midwives in the Implementation of Maternal and Child Health Programs in Central Luzon, Philippines: A Qualitative Study.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Exploring Somali-born women's experiences with contraceptive services in Sweden through a reproductive justice lens.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Nursing and Midwifery's Impact on Health Policy Development: A Literature Review.International nursing review · 2025Review
- Maximising contributions of midwives in Africa towards achieving MNH targets: Lessons learned.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- A narrative review of Master's programs in midwifery across selected OECD countries: Organizational aspects, competence goals and learning outcomes.European journal of midwifery · 2024Review
- Applying an equity lens to hospital safety monitoring: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
- Feasibility issues impacting optimal levels of maternity care in rural communities: implementing the Rural Birth Index in British Columbia.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- How to Support the Referral Towards Group Antenatal Care in Belgian Primary Healthcare Organizations: A Qualitative Study.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Evidence-informed framework for gender transformative continuing education interventions for midwives and midwifery associations.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care.PLOS global public health · 2023Review
- Midwifery care providers' childbirth and immediate newborn care competencies: A cross-sectional study in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- A lack of reproductive agency in facility-based births makes home births a first choice regardless of potential risks and medical needs-a qualitative study among multiparous women in Somaliland.Global health action · 2022Article
- Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.Health policy and planning · 2022Article
- Leveling up evidence syntheses: filling conceptual gaps of the role of midwifery in health systems through a network analysis.BMC research notes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidwives' roles in sexual and reproductive health and rights continues to evolve. Understanding the profession's role and how midwives can be integrated into health systems is essential in creating evidence-informed policies. Our objective was to develop a theoretical framework of how political system factors and health systems arrangements influence the roles of midwives within the health system.
methodsA critical interpretive synthesis was used to develop the theoretical framework. A range of electronic bibliographic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health database, HealthSTAR, Health Systems Evidence, MEDLINE and Web of Science) was searched through to 14 May 2020 as were policy and health systems-related and midwifery organisation websites. A coding structure was created to guide the data extraction.
resultsA total of 4533 unique documents were retrieved through electronic searches, of which 4132 were excluded using explicit criteria, leaving 401 potentially relevant records, in addition to the 29 records that were purposively sampled through grey literature. A total of 100 documents were included in the critical interpretive synthesis. The resulting theoretical framework identified the range of political and health system components that can work together to facilitate the integration of midwifery into health systems or act as barriers that restrict the roles of the profession.
conclusionsAny changes to the roles of midwives in health systems need to take into account the political system where decisions about their integration will be made as well as the nature of the health system in which they are being integrated. The theoretical framework, which can be thought of as a heuristic, identifies the core contextual factors that governments can use to best leverage their position when working to improve sexual and reproductive health and rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.