Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32641018›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Patient outcomes in Anteromedial osteoarthritis patients over 80 years old undergoing Oxford Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty in China.

Jingbo Cheng, Mingli Feng, Guanglei Cao, Zheng Li, Shuai An, Shibao Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical effect of warm needle penetration in treating knee osteoarthritis.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingbo ChengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-1358
Mingli FengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China. fengmingli6666@163.com.
Guanglei CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Zheng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Shuai AnDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Shibao LuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Changchun Ave 45, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) has increased rapidly in both Western and Asian populations, with excellent functional outcomes and high patient satisfaction. While previous evidence regarding clinical outcomes and survival rates after Oxford UKA was based on studies in Western populations, the results may be different in Asian patients. The relevance of age for postoperative function after Oxford UKA also remains unclear. Hence, the aim of our study was to clarify the effectiveness and safety of Oxford UKA in Asian patients aged over 80 years.

methodsA retrospective review was performed and included 195 patients (209 knees) who underwent an Oxford UKA between June 2015 and July 2018. We divided the patients into three groups by age: Group 1, 60-69 years; Group 2, 70-79 years; and Group 3, over 80 years. We used the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index score to evaluate the general condition of the patients' knees before surgery and at last follow-up. We also recorded perioperative and short-term complications.

resultGroup 1 consisted of 60 patients (60 knees); Group 2, 70 patients (79 knees); and Group 3, 65 patients (70 knees). The mean follow-up was 21.34 ± 12.04, 22.08 ± 11.38, and 21.76 ± 10.20 months in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At last follow-up, the patients in Group 3 showed lower function scores compared to groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), but the HSS scores and the WOMAC scores were significantly improved in all three groups. In terms of perioperative and other complications, the three age groups did not differ significantly.

conclusionOxford UKA is an effective and safe treatment for osteoarthritis, even in elderly patients in China. Elderly patients have lower knee function scores than younger patients. However, the knee joint pain of the elderly patients was relieved and function improved compared to the preoperative condition.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolChinaHumansInfantKnee JointMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective Studies80 years oldOxford Unicompartmental knee ArthroplastyPerioperative complicationRestoration of functionSafety

Identifiers

PMID32641018
PMCPMC7346402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.