Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640765›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Prediction of Chromatographic Elution Order of Analytical Mixtures Based on Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships and Multi-Objective Optimization.

Petar Žuvela, J Jay Liu, Ming Wah Wong, Tomasz Bączek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petar ŽuvelaDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
J Jay LiuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea.
Ming Wah WongDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-1220
Tomasz BączekDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-416 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6468-1974

Funding

Pukyong National University 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of the retention time from the molecular structure using quantitative structure-retention relationships is a powerful tool for the development of methods in reversed-phase HPLC. However, its fundamental limitation lies in the fact that low error in the prediction of the retention time does not necessarily guarantee a prediction of the elution order. Here, we propose a new method for the prediction of the elution order from quantitative structure-retention relationships using multi-objective optimization. Two case studies were evaluated: (i) separation of organic molecules in a Supelcosil LC-18 column, and (ii) separation of peptides in seven columns under varying conditions. Results have shown that, when compared to predictions based on the conventional model, the relative root mean square error of the elution order decreases by 48.84%, while the relative root mean square error of the retention time increases by 4.22% on average across both case studies. The predictive ability in terms of both retention time and elution order and the corresponding applicability domains were defined. The models were deemed stable and robust with few to no structural outliers.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseModels, ChemicalPeptidesQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipSoftwarePeptideselution order predictionmulti-objective optimizationquantitative structure-retention relationshipsreversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography

Identifiers

PMID32640765
PMCPMC7411958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.