ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Sex-Specific Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex disparities in young adults aged 20-40 with acute coronary syndrome.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Sex-related differences in acute coronary syndrome: insights from an observational study in a Yemeni cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluate gender differences in patients with left main coronary artery disease.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2025Article
- Sex Disparities in Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Racial disparities in women with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A National Inpatient Sample review of baseline characteristics, co-morbidities, and outcomes in women with STEMI.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Sex differences in long-term outcomes in older adults undergoing invasive treatment for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: An ICON-1 sub-study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Associated with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Sex as a Prognostic Factor in Systematic Reviews: Challenges and Lessons Learned.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Sex Differences in the Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Spain, 2016-2018: A Matched-Pair Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are a matter of debate. We investigated sex-specific differences in the incidence, outcomes, and related interventions in patients diagnosed with ACS in Germany over the past decade. All ACS cases from 2005 to 2015 were collected. Procedures and inhospital mortality were assessed by sex. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. In total, 1,366,045 females and 2,431,501 males presenting with ACS were recorded. Females were older than males (73.1 vs. 66.4 years of age), had a longer mean hospital stay (7.7 vs. 6.9 days), and less frequently underwent coronary angiographies (55% vs. 66%) and coronary interventions (35% vs. 47%). The age-adjusted incidence rate of ACS was lower in females than in males, and decreased in both sexes from 2005 to 2015. The age-adjusted inhospital mortality rate was substantially higher in females than in males, but decreased in both sexes over time (in females, from 87 to 71 cases per 1000 person years; in males, from 57 to 51 cases per 1000 person years). In conclusion, we reported sex differences in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of ACS patients in Germany within the past decade. Women had a substantially higher mortality rate and lower rate of coronary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.