Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640657›Full record

ReviewProteomes2020

A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of this Field.

Emmalyn J Dupree, Madhuri Jayathirtha, Hannah Yorkey, Marius Mihasan, Brindusa Alina Petre, Costel C Darie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis of Lysosome-Enriched Fractions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmalyn J DupreeBiochemistry & Proteomics Group, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA.
Madhuri JayathirthaBiochemistry & Proteomics Group, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA.
Hannah YorkeyBiochemistry & Proteomics Group, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA.
Marius MihasanLaboratory of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania.
Brindusa Alina PetreLaboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-6560
Costel C DarieBiochemistry & Proteomics Group, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-2311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics is the field of study that includes the analysis of proteins, from either a basic science prospective or a clinical one. Proteins can be investigated for their abundance, variety of proteoforms due to post-translational modifications (PTMs), and their stable or transient protein-protein interactions. This can be especially beneficial in the clinical setting when studying proteins involved in different diseases and conditions. Here, we aim to describe a bottom-up proteomics workflow from sample preparation to data analysis, including all of its benefits and pitfalls. We also describe potential improvements in this type of proteomics workflow for the future.

Indexed as

mass spectrometryprotein characterizationprotein identificationproteomics

Identifiers

PMID32640657
PMCPMC7564415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.