ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Foot-Mounted Pedestrian Navigation Method by Comparing ADR and Modified ZUPT Based on MEMS IMU Array.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using an MEMS Inertial Measurement Unit (MEMS IMU) array mounted on foot is a feasible approach to improve the pedestrian tracking accuracy for the pedestrian navigation system (PNS). Based on the in-house developed IMU array, the paper proposes a new integrated framework that combines adaptive deck reckoning (ADR) with the modified zero velocity update (ZUPT). In the proposed ADR algorithm, the IMUs with large drift errors on the array are selected and removed according to the step length and the track angle computed by each IMU on the array. Then, by using the step length and the track angle of each step computed by remaining IMUs, the foot position extracted from the traditional ZUPT model is estimated on the basis of least squares (LS) so as to improve the traveled distance calculation accuracy. Compared with the traditional IMU array fusion method based on a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) when it is used in the PNS, which is approximately taking the mean value of array readings, the proposed method is equivalent to adaptively fusing the array readings and thus improves the pedestrian tracking accuracy. To compare the proposed method with MLE, two different types of walking tracks are designed. The 161 m straight line experiments show that the end position by ADR/modified ZUPT method is much closer to the one of the reference trajectory compared with the MLE in repeated walks, and the closed-loop tracks about 300 m show that the positioning error with respect to the total traveled distance is less than 0.6% (1σ), which is higher than 1% (1σ) of MLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.