Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640606›Full record

ArticleHigh-throughput2020

Influence of the Ovine Genital Tract Microbiota on the Species Artificial Insemination Outcome. A Pilot Study in Commercial Sheep Farms.

Malena Serrano, Eric Climent, Fernando Freire, Juan F Martínez-Blanch, Carmen González, Luis Reyes, M Carmen Solaz-Fuster, Jorge H Calvo, M Ángeles Jiménez, Francisco M Codoñer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in High-throughput, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In Vitro Interaction betweenMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malena SerranoDepartment of Animal Genetic Improvement, National Institute of Agrarian Technology and Food-INIA, Ctra. de la Coruña, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Eric ClimentADM Lifesequencing, University of Valencia Science Park, Carrer del Catedrático A. Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Fernando FreireOVIGEN, Granja Florencia S/N, Ctra. Villalazán-Peleagonzalo, 49800 Zamora, Spain.
Juan F Martínez-BlanchADM Lifesequencing, University of Valencia Science Park, Carrer del Catedrático A. Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Carmen GonzálezDepartment of Animal Genetic Improvement, National Institute of Agrarian Technology and Food-INIA, Ctra. de la Coruña, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Luis ReyesOVIGEN, Granja Florencia S/N, Ctra. Villalazán-Peleagonzalo, 49800 Zamora, Spain.
M Carmen Solaz-FusterADM Lifesequencing, University of Valencia Science Park, Carrer del Catedrático A. Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Jorge H CalvoAnimal Production Technology Unit-CITA, 59059 Zaragoza, Spain.
M Ángeles JiménezDepartment of Animal Genetic Improvement, National Institute of Agrarian Technology and Food-INIA, Ctra. de la Coruña, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Francisco M CodoñerADM Lifesequencing, University of Valencia Science Park, Carrer del Catedrático A. Escardino Benlloch 9, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Parc Científic de la Universitat de València · ESHospital Virgen de la Concha · ESFundacion Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacion y el Desarrollo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, there is a lack of research into the vaginal and sperm microbiome and its bearing on artificial insemination (AI) success in the ovine species. Using hypervariable regions V3-V4 of the 16S rRNA, we describe, for the first time, the combined effect of the ovine microbiome of both females (50 ewes belonging to five herds) and males (five AI rams from an AI center) on AI outcome. Differences in microbiota abundance between pregnant and non-pregnant ewes and between ewes carrying progesterone-releasing intravaginal devices (PRID) with or without antibiotic were tested at different taxonomic levels. The antibiotic treatment applied with the PRID only altered

Indexed as

artificial insemination (AI)microbiotareproductive tractssheep

Identifiers

PMID32640606
PMCPMC7576495
OpenAlexW3039330006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.