Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640583›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Improved Diagnostic Imaging of Brain Tumors by Multimodal Microscopy and Deep Learning.

Johanna Gesperger, Antonia Lichtenegger, Thomas Roetzer, Matthias Salas, Pablo Eugui, Danielle J Harper, Conrad W Merkle, Marco Augustin, Barbara Kiesel, Petra A Mercea and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The neurosurgical benefit of contactlessFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna GespergerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-0675
Antonia LichteneggerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-9547
Thomas RoetzerDivision of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-7304
Matthias SalasCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Pablo EuguiCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3007-2385
Danielle J HarperCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-3684
Conrad W MerkleCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-4100
Marco AugustinCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Barbara KieselDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Petra A MerceaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Georg WidhalmDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard BaumannCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-1932
Adelheid WoehrerDivision of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8435-8189
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence-guided surgery is a state-of-the-art approach for intraoperative imaging during neurosurgical removal of tumor tissue. While the visualization of high-grade gliomas is reliable, lower grade glioma often lack visible fluorescence signals. Here, we present a hybrid prototype combining visible light optical coherence microscopy (OCM) and high-resolution fluorescence imaging for assessment of brain tumor samples acquired by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence-guided surgery. OCM provides high-resolution information of the inherent tissue scattering and absorption properties of tissue. We here explore quantitative attenuation coefficients derived from volumetric OCM intensity data and quantitative high-resolution 5-ALA fluorescence as potential biomarkers for tissue malignancy including otherwise difficult-to-assess low-grade glioma. We validate our findings against the gold standard histology and use attenuation and fluorescence intensity measures to differentiate between tumor core, infiltrative zone and adjacent brain tissue. Using large field-of-view scans acquired by a near-infrared swept-source optical coherence tomography setup, we provide initial assessments of tumor heterogeneity. Finally, we use cross-sectional OCM images to train a convolutional neural network that discriminates tumor from non-tumor tissue with an accuracy of 97%. Collectively, the present hybrid approach offers potential to translate into an in vivo imaging setup for substantially improved intraoperative guidance of brain tumor surgeries.

Indexed as

attenuationgliomametastasisoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID32640583
PMCPMC7408054
OpenAlexW3040643881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.