ReviewCells2020
Modeling of Cell Nuclear Mechanics: Classes, Components, and Applications.
Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
- Constitutive heterochromatin controls nuclear mechanics, morphology, and integrity through H3K9me3 mediated chromocenter compaction.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2025Article
- Lamin B loss in nuclear blebs is rupture dependent whereas increased DNA damage is rupture independent.Journal of cell science · 2025Article
- Nuclear deformation by microtubule molecular motors.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Decreased DNA density is a better indicator of a nuclear bleb than lamin B loss.Journal of cell science · 2025Article
- How the chromatin landscape influences nuclear morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- PIGB maintains nuclear lamina organization in skeletal muscle of Drosophila.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Unravelling cell migration: defining movement from the cell surface.Cell adhesion & migration · 2022Review
- A Versatile Micromanipulation Apparatus for Biophysical Assays of the Cell Nucleus.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2022Article
- Force Estimation during Cell Migration Using Mathematical Modelling.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- A survey of physical methods for studying nuclear mechanics and mechanobiology.APL bioengineering · 2021Review
- Modelling Nuclear Morphology and Shape Transformation: A Review.Membranes · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cell nuclei are paramount for both cellular function and mechanical stability. These two roles of nuclei are intertwined as altered mechanical properties of nuclei are associated with altered cell behavior and disease. To further understand the mechanical properties of cell nuclei and guide future experiments, many investigators have turned to mechanical modeling. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of mechanical modeling of cell nuclei with an emphasis on the role of the nuclear lamina in hopes of spurring future growth of this field. The goal of this review is to provide an introduction to mechanical modeling techniques, highlight current applications to nuclear mechanics, and give insight into future directions of mechanical modeling. There are three main classes of mechanical models-schematic, continuum mechanics, and molecular dynamics-which provide unique advantages and limitations. Current experimental understanding of the roles of the cytoskeleton, the nuclear lamina, and the chromatin in nuclear mechanics provide the basis for how each component is subsequently treated in mechanical models. Modeling allows us to interpret assay-specific experimental results for key parameters and quantitatively predict emergent behaviors. This is specifically powerful when emergent phenomena, such as lamin-based strain stiffening, can be deduced from complimentary experimental techniques. Modeling differences in force application, geometry, or composition can additionally clarify seemingly conflicting experimental results. Using these approaches, mechanical models have informed our understanding of relevant biological processes such as migration, nuclear blebbing, nuclear rupture, and cell spreading and detachment. There remain many aspects of nuclear mechanics for which additional mechanical modeling could provide immediate insight. Although mechanical modeling of cell nuclei has been employed for over a decade, there are still relatively few models for any given biological phenomenon. This implies that an influx of research into this realm of the field has the potential to dramatically shape both future experiments and our current understanding of nuclear mechanics, function, and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.