Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640453›Full record

ArticleRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases

Differences in Lung and Lobe Volumes between Supine and Standing Positions Scanned with Conventional and Newly Developed 320-Detector-Row Upright CT: Intra-Individual Comparison.

Yoshitake Yamada, Minoru Yamada, Yoichi Yokoyama, Akiko Tanabe, Shiho Matsuoka, Yuki Niijima, Keiichi Narita, Takehiro Nakahara, Mitsuru Murata, Koichi Fukunaga and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thoracic posture-related morphological changes in patients with pectus excavatum versus healthy controls.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshitake YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, yamada@rad.med.keio.ac.jp.
Minoru YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi YokoyamaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko TanabeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shiho MatsuokaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki NiijimaOffice of Radiation Technology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi NaritaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehiro NakaharaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuru MurataDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi FukunagaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shotaro ChubachiDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro JinzakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPKeio University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo clinical studies to date have compared unilateral lung or lobe volumes between the supine and standing positions.

objectivesTo compare lung/lobe volumes on computed tomography (CT) between these two positions and evaluate the correlation between the total lung volume and total lung capacity (TLC) on pulmonary function tests (PFTs).

methodsThirty-two asymptomatic volunteers underwent both conventional CT (supine position) and upright CT (standing position), during deep inspiration breath-hold, and PFTs on the same day. We measured lung/lobe volumes on CT in each position. Paired t tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe volumes of the total lung (10.9% increase), right lung (10.3% increase), right upper lobe (8.6% increase), right lower lobe (14.6% increase), left lung (11.6% increase), left upper lobe (7.1% increase), and left lower lobe (16.0% increase) were significantly greater in the standing position than in the supine position (all p < 0.0001). The right middle lobe volume was similar between the two positions (p = 0.16). Intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement between total lung volumes on CT in the supine/standing positions and the TLC on PFT were 0.891/0.938, respectively.

conclusionsWhile the volumes of the bilateral upper and lower lobes and bilateral lungs were significantly greater in the standing than in the supine position, with lower lobes showing larger changes, the right middle lobe volume did not change significantly between positions. The total lung volume on upright CT in the standing position was more similar to TLC on PFT than that in the supine position.

Indexed as

Multidetector Computed TomographyRadiography, ThoracicStanding PositionSupine PositionAdultAgedFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesTotal Lung CapacityLung volume measurementsMultidetector computed tomographyPostureStanding positionThorax

Identifiers

PMID32640453
PMCPMC7490509
OpenAlexW3041774212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.