Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640427›Full record

ArticleBiomedical materials (Bristol, England)2020

Effect of sterilization treatment on mechanical properties, biodegradation, bioactivity and printability of GelMA hydrogels.

Muhammad Rizwan, Sarah W Chan, Patricia A Comeau, Thomas L Willett, Evelyn K F Yim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-0036
Sarah W ChanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Patricia A ComeauSystems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Thomas L WillettSystems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6220-4557
Evelyn K F YimDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-1801
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

Surface Modification Compliant Vascular GraftsR01HL130274 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HINDS, MONICA T, YIM, EVELYN KING FAI · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
CIHR 389569NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel scaffolds and GelMA-based bioinks are widely used in tissue engineering and bioprinting due to their ability to support cellular functions and new tissue development. Unfortunately, while terminal sterilization of the GelMA is a critical step for translational tissue engineering applications, it can potentially cause thermal or chemical modifications of GelMA. Thus, understanding the effect of terminal sterilization on GelMA properties is an important, though often overlooked, aspect of material design for translational tissue engineering applications. To this end, we characterized the effects of FDA-approved terminal sterilization methods (autoclaving, ethylene oxide treatment, and gamma (γ)-irradiation) on GelMA prepolymer (bioink) and GelMA hydrogels in terms of the relevant properties for biomedical applications, including mechanical strength, biodegradation rate, cell culture in 2D and 3D, and printability. Autoclaving and ethylene oxide treatment of the GelMA decreased the stiffness of the hydrogel, but the treatments did not modify the biodegradation rate of the hydrogel; meanwhile, γ-irradiation increased the stiffness, reduced the pore size and significantly slowed the biodegradation rate. None of the terminal sterilization methods changed the 2D fibroblast or endothelial cell adhesion and spreading. However, ethylene oxide treatment significantly lowered the fibroblast viability in 3D cell culture. Strikingly, γ-irradiation led to significantly reduced ability of the GelMA prepolymer to undergo sol-gel transition. Furthermore, printability studies showed that the bioinks prepared from γ-irradiated GelMA had significantly reduced printability as compared to the GelMA bioinks prepared from autoclaved or ethylene oxide treated GelMA. These results reveal that the choice of the terminal sterilization method can strongly influence important properties of GelMA bioink and hydrogel. Overall, this study provides further insight into GelMA-based material design with consideration of the effect of terminal sterilization.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesEthylene OxideFibroblastsGamma RaysGelatinHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsHydrogelsInkMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaterials TestingPhase TransitionPrinting, Three-DimensionalRheologyEthylene OxideGelatinHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID32640427
PMCPMC7733554
OpenAlexW3040763730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.