Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32640176›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Toward an Individualized Neural Assessment of Receptive Language in Children.

Selene Petit, Nicholas A Badcock, Tijl Grootswagers, Anina N Rich, Jon Brock, Lyndsey Nickels, Denise Moerel, Nadene Dermody, Shu Yau, Elaine Schmidt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How auditory processing influences the autistic profile: A review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Selene PetitPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas A BadcockPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tijl GrootswagersPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anina N RichPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jon BrockDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lyndsey NickelsDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Denise MoerelPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nadene DermodyPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shu YauSchool of Psychology & Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Elaine SchmidtChild Language Lab, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alexandra WoolgarPerception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to develop a noninvasive neural test of language comprehension to use with nonspeaking children for whom standard behavioral testing is unreliable (e.g., minimally verbal autism). Our aims were threefold. First, we sought to establish the sensitivity of two auditory paradigms to elicit neural responses in individual neurotypical children. Second, we aimed to validate the use of a portable and accessible electroencephalography (EEG) system, by comparing its recordings to those of a research-grade system. Third, in light of substantial interindividual variability in individuals' neural responses, we assessed whether multivariate decoding methods could improve sensitivity. Method We tested the sensitivity of two child-friendly covert N400 paradigms. Thirty-one typically developing children listened to identical spoken words that were either strongly predicted by the preceding context or violated lexical-semantic expectations. Context was given by a cue word (Experiment 1) or sentence frame (Experiment 2), and participants either made an overall judgment on word relatedness or counted lexical-semantic violations. We measured EEG concurrently from a research-grade system, Neuroscan's SynAmps2, and an adapted gaming system, Emotiv's EPOC+. Results We found substantial interindividual variability in the timing and topology of N400-like effects. For both paradigms and EEG systems, traditional N400 effects at the expected sensors and time points were statistically significant in around 50% of individuals. Using multivariate analyses, detection rate increased to 88% of individuals for the research-grade system in the sentences paradigm, illustrating the robustness of this method in the face of interindividual variations in topography. Conclusions There was large interindividual variability in neural responses, suggesting interindividual variation in either the cognitive response to lexical-semantic violations and/or the neural substrate of that response. Around half of our neurotypical participants showed the expected N400 effect at the expected location and time points. A low-cost, accessible EEG system provided comparable data for univariate analysis but was not well suited to multivariate decoding. However, multivariate analyses with a research-grade EEG system increased our detection rate to 88% of individuals. This approach provides a strong foundation to establish a neural index of language comprehension in children with limited communication. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12606311.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyLanguageChildComprehensionEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleSemantics

Identifiers

PMID32640176
PMCPMC7116229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.