ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020
The Relation Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Phonological Awareness in Children With Cochlear Implants.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Vocabulary Acquisition Persist Under Variable Language Experience.Developmental science · 2026Article
- Explicit tier two vocabulary instruction for young deaf children.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2025Article
- Communication Preferences of School-Age Children with Cochlear Implants in Multilingual Educational Settings: Implications for Inclusive Education and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of the Phonetic and Phonological Development of Children with Cochlear Implants and Its Relationship with Early Literacy.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Is Knowing Words Enough? Assessing Vocabulary in Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025Article
- Parent-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Linked Behaviors, Fatigue, and Language in Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023Article
- Impact of Meeting Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Benchmarks on Spoken Language.Journal of early intervention · 2022Article
- The Effects of Virtual Assessment on Capturing Skill Growth in Children With Hearing Loss.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022Article
- Evaluation of phoneme recognition skills in pediatric auditory brainstem implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- Location Effects on Spoken Language and Literacy for Children who are DHH.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2021Article
- The Impact of Hearing Experience on Children's Use of Phonological and Semantic Information During Lexical Access.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Transitioning Speech-Language Assessment to a Virtual Environment: Lessons Learned From the ELLA Study.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation between lexical knowledge and phonological awareness performance of children with cochlear implants. Method Thirty children with cochlear implants (aged 5-7 years), 30 children with normal hearing matched for age, and 30 children with normal hearing matched for vocabulary size participated in the study. Children completed a vocabulary knowledge measure and three phonological awareness tasks with words that had high and low neighborhood density. Results Children with cochlear implants performed more poorly than their age-matched peers and similarly to their vocabulary-matched peers on phonological awareness tasks. When performance was analyzed according to the neighborhood density of the target word, children with cochlear implants and age-matched children performed better with high-density words. Across all groups, vocabulary size correlated significantly with phonological awareness performance. Conclusion Children with cochlear implants demonstrate delays in both vocabulary knowledge and phonological awareness performance, but children with cochlear implants appear to take advantage of lexical information similarly to their age-matched peers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.