Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32639993›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Kinome capture sequencing of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma reveals novel mutations in the JAK3 gene.

Lorenza Mittempergher, Anna M Piskorz, Astrid J Bosma, Magali Michaut, G Bea A Wisman, Roelof J C Kluin, Marja Nieuwland, Wim Brugman, Kevin J W van der Ven, Francesco Marass and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lorenza MittempergherDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-3965
Anna M PiskorzCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Astrid J BosmaDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Magali MichautDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G Bea A WismanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roelof J C KluinGenomics Core Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marja NieuwlandGenomics Core Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim BrugmanGenomics Core Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin J W van der VenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francesco MarassCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-7320
James MorrisCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nitzan RosenfeldCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mercedes Jimenez-LinanCancer Research UK Major Centre-Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Steven de JongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ate G J van der ZeeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
James D BrentonCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
René BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Groningen · NLCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11906Cancer Research UK 15601Cancer Research UK 22905Cancer Research UK 28292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) remains the deadliest form of epithelial ovarian cancer and despite major efforts little improvement in overall survival has been achieved. Identification of recurring "driver" genetic lesions has the potential to enable design of novel therapies for cancer. Here, we report on a study to find such new therapeutic targets for HGSOC using exome-capture sequencing approach targeting all kinase genes in 127 patient samples. Consistent with previous reports, the most frequently mutated gene was TP53 (97% mutation frequency) followed by BRCA1 (10% mutation frequency). The average mutation frequency of the kinase genes mutated from our panel was 1.5%. Intriguingly, after BRCA1, JAK3 was the most frequently mutated gene (4% mutation frequency). We tested the transforming properties of JAK3 mutants using the Ba/F3 cell-based in vitro functional assay and identified a novel gain-of-function mutation in the kinase domain of JAK3 (p.T1022I). Importantly, p.T1022I JAK3 mutants displayed higher sensitivity to the JAK3-selective inhibitor Tofacitinib compared to controls. For independent validation, we re-sequenced the entire JAK3 coding sequence using tagged amplicon sequencing (TAm-Seq) in 463 HGSOCs resulting in an overall somatic mutation frequency of 1%. TAm-Seq screening of CDK12 in the same population revealed a 7% mutation frequency. Our data confirms that the frequency of mutations in kinase genes in HGSOC is low and provides accurate estimates for the frequency of JAK3 and CDK12 mutations in a large well characterized cohort. Although p.T1022I JAK3 mutations are rare, our functional validation shows that if detected they should be considered as potentially actionable for therapy. The observation of CDK12 mutations in 7% of HGSOC cases provides a strong rationale for routine somatic testing, although more functional and clinical characterization is required to understand which nonsynonymous mutations alterations are associated with homologous recombination deficiency.

Indexed as

MutationBRCA1 ProteinCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansJanus Kinase 3Ovarian NeoplasmsProtein KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanJAK3 protein, humanJanus Kinase 3Protein KinasesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32639993
PMCPMC7343160
OpenAlexW3041790094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.