Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32639899›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

A Survey of Iranian Primiparous Women's Perceptions of Vaginal Examination During Labor.

Samaneh Dabagh-Fekri, Leila Amiri-Farahani, Leila Amini, Sally Pezaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying the effective components of a standardized labor induction protocol: secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samaneh Dabagh-FekriArdabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Leila Amiri-FarahaniIran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3691-8246
Leila AminiIran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sally PezaroCoventry University, Coventry, UK.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRArdabil University of Medical Sciences · IRCoventry University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Gynecological ExaminationPerceptionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesexperiencelaborperceptionvaginal examination

Identifiers

PMID32639899
PMCPMC7359644
OpenAlexW3038539054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.