Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32639712›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2020

Bioinspired Multiresonant Acoustic Devices Based on Electrospun Piezoelectric Polymeric Nanofibers.

Giuseppe Viola, Jinke Chang, Thomas Maltby, Felix Steckler, Mohamed Jomaa, Jianfei Sun, Janelle Edusei, Dong Zhang, Antonio Vilches, Shuo Gao and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emerging Wearable Acoustic Sensing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Promising Applications of Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Hearing Loss.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe ViolaUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Jinke ChangUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Thomas MaltbyElectrical and Electronic Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom.
Felix StecklerUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Mohamed JomaaUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Jianfei SunUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Janelle EduseiUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Dong ZhangUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.
Antonio VilchesElectrical and Electronic Engineering, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, United Kingdom.
Shuo GaoUCL Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.
Xiao LiuUCL Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.
Shakeel SaeedUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom.
Hassan ZabalawiUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom.
Jonathan GaleUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom.
Wenhui SongUCL Centre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-472X
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity College London · GBLondon South Bank University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear hair cells are critical for the conversion of acoustic into electrical signals and their dysfunction is a primary cause of acquired hearing impairments, which worsen with aging. Piezoelectric materials can reproduce the acoustic-electrical transduction properties of the cochlea and represent promising candidates for future cochlear prostheses. The majority of piezoelectric hearing devices so far developed are based on thin films, which have not managed to simultaneously provide the desired flexibility, high sensitivity, wide frequency selectivity, and biocompatibility. To overcome these issues, we hypothesized that fibrous membranes made up of polymeric piezoelectric biocompatible nanofibers could be employed to mimic the function of the basilar membrane, by selectively vibrating in response to different frequencies of sound and transmitting the resulting electrical impulses to the vestibulocochlear nerve. In this study, poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) piezoelectric nanofiber-based acoustic circular sensors were designed and fabricated using the electrospinning technique. The performance of the sensors was investigated with particular focus on the identification of the resonance frequencies and acoustic-electrical conversion in fibrous membrane with different size and fiber orientation. The voltage output (1-17 mV) varied in the range of low resonance frequency (100-400 Hz) depending on the diameter of the macroscale sensors and alignment of the fibers. The devices developed can be regarded as a proof-of-concept demonstrating the possibility of using piezoelectric fibers to convert acoustic waves into electrical signals, through possible synergistic effects of piezoelectricity and triboelectricity. The study has paved the way for the development of self-powered nanofibrous implantable auditory sensors.

Indexed as

AcousticsElectricityNanofibersParticle SizePolymersSurface PropertiesPolymersacoustic-electrical conversion devicecochlea implantelectrospinningmultiresonanceP(VDF-TrFE) piezoelectric nanofibers

Identifiers

PMID32639712
PMCPMC7460092
OpenAlexW3042216236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.