Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32639101›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Eyes wide shut: How visual cues affect brain patterns of simulated gait.

Laura Zapparoli, Silvia Seghezzi, Lucia Maria Sacheli, Chiara Verga, Giuseppe Banfi, Eraldo Paulesu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura ZapparoliPsychology Department & Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-942X
Silvia SeghezziPsychology Department & Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Lucia Maria SacheliPsychology Department & Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-708X
Chiara VergaPsychology Department & Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BanfifMRI Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Eraldo PaulesuPsychology Department & Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health N. RF-2011-02350666Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMi)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 20 years, motor imagery (MI) has been extensively used to train motor abilities in sport and in rehabilitation. However, MI procedures are not all alike as much as their potential beneficiaries. Here we assessed whether the addition of visual cues could make MI performance more comparable with explicit motor performance in gait tasks. With fMRI we also explored the neural correlates of these experimental manipulations. We did this in elderly subjects who are known to rely less on kinesthetic information while favoring visual strategies during motor performance. Contrary to expectations, we found that the temporal coupling between execution and imagery times, an index of the quality of MI, was less precise when participants were allowed to visually explore the environment. While the brain activation patterns of the gait motor circuits were very similar in both an open-eyed and eye-shut virtual walking MI task, these differed for a vast temporo-occipito-parietal additional activation for open-eyed MI. Crucially, the higher was the activity in this posterior network, the less accurate was the MI performance with eyes open at a clinical test of gait. We conclude that both visually-cued and internally-cued MI are associated with the neurofunctional activation of a gait specific motor system. The less precise behavioral coupling between imagined and executed gait while keeping eyes open may be attributed to the processing load implied in visual monitoring and scanning of the environment. The implications of these observations for rehabilitation of gait with MI are discussed.

Indexed as

CuesAgedCerebral CortexFemaleGaitHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityNerve NetPsychomotor PerformanceTime FactorsVisual PerceptionfMRIgaitmotor imagerymotor rehabilitationvisual cues

Identifiers

PMID32639101
PMCPMC7502842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.