Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638944›Full record

Observational studyRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2021

INCIDENCE OF SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE NEONATES, ACCORDING TO THE FENTON AND INTERGROWTH-21ST CURVES IN A LEVEL II MATERNITY.

Claudia Malisano Barreto, Marley Aparecida Lambert Pereira, Anna Carolina Boni Rolim, Samira Ali Abbas, Dante Mario Langhi Junior, Amélia Miyashiro Nunes Dos Santos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia Malisano BarretoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marley Aparecida Lambert PereiraHospital São Luiz Gonzaga, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Anna Carolina Boni RolimUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Samira Ali AbbasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dante Mario Langhi JuniorSchool of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Amélia Miyashiro Nunes Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the incidence of small for gestational age infants among late preterm and term newborns, using the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st curves.

methodsObservational and retrospective study with newborns in a level II maternity. The study was approved by the Institution's Ethics Committee. Live births from July 2007 to February 2009 with a gestational age from 34 to 41 weeks and seven days were included. Neonates with incomplete data were excluded. Appropriate weight for gestational age was assessed by the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st intrauterine growth curves, considering birth weight <10th percentile as small for gestational age. The degree of agreement between the two curves was assessed by the Kappa coefficient. Numerical variables were compared using the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS17® software, considering significant, p<0.05.

resultsWe included 2849 newborns with a birthweight of 3210±483 g, gestational age of 38.8±1.4 weeks; 51.1% male. The incidence of small for gestational age in the full sample was 13.0 vs. 8.7% (p<0.001, Kappa=0.667) by the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st curves, respectively. Among late preterm, the incidence of small neonates was 11.3 vs. 10.9% (p<0.001; Kappa=0.793) and among full-term infants it was 13.1% vs. 8.5% (p<0.001; Kappa=0.656), respectively for the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st curves.

conclusionsThe incidence of small for gestational age newborns was significantly higher using the Fenton curve, with greater agreement between the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st curves among late preterm, compared to full term neonates.

Indexed as

Birth WeightInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultBrazilFemaleGestational AgeHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLive BirthMalePregnancyReference ValuesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32638944
PMCPMC7333938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.