ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Reference interval and the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in subclinical cardiac dysfunction at health checkups.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elevated Soluble Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 2 Levels in Gout Patients and Its Association with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Indicators.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Article
- Predictive value of baseline serum sST2 and BNP levels for treatment efficacy in patients with heart failure.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) for cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Observational
- Reference interval and the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in subclinical cardiac dysfunction at health checkups.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoluble ST2 (sST2) is known to predict adverse outcomes and death in individuals with established heart failure. However, the role of sST2 testing in the general population has not been established. The aims of this study were to determine the reference interval (RI) and the clinical utility of sST2 in subclinical cardiac dysfunction in general population.
methodsThis cross-sectional study consecutively selected 41,806 general subjects at health checkups who underwent echocardiography and sST2 testing at 16 health promotion centers in 13 Korean cities. The reference subjects were obtained among those with normal findings in echocardiography. Sex-specific RIs were established according to the CLSI C28-A3 guidelines. sST2 was measured using immunoassay with the Presage ST2 assay (Critical Diagnostics).
resultsIn the general subjects, age, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, blood glucose, creatinine, liver function, and triglycerides were associated with the sST2 levels. The RI for sST2 was higher in males (≤49.6 ng/mL, 95% CI = 48.5-51.5) than in females (≤44.5 ng/mL, 95% CI = 43.5-45.6) and higher in subjects aged < 40 years than ≥ 40 years in both sexes. The sST2 levels were 29.1 ± 10.7 (mean ± SD) and 29.1 ± 14.4 ng/mL in the groups with normal cardiac function and subclinical cardiac dysfunction, respectively. The sST2 level was not associated with subclinical cardiac dysfunction (odd ratio = 1.002, P = .13).
conclusionsRIs obtained from a large and echocardiography-proven healthy community-based sample are presented. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction was associated with older age, male sex, and metabolic factors but not with the sST2 level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.