Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3263835›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1988

Effects of amodiaquine, chloroquine, and mefloquine on human polymorphonuclear neutrophil function in vitro.

M T Labro, C Babin-Chevaye

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of anti-infectious agents on polymorphonuclear neutrophils.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1991
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M T LabroInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U. 294, CHU X. Bichat, Paris, France.
C Babin-Chevaye
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study concerns the in vitro interaction with human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) of amodiaquine, chloroquine, and mefloquine, three antimalarial drugs currently in use for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria. It was found that mefloquine (100 and 50 micrograms/ml) significantly altered PMN viability while the other two drugs did not. Neutrophil chemotaxis was impaired by chloroquine (100 micrograms/ml) and mefloquine (greater than 10 micrograms/ml) but not by amodiaquine. Phagocytosis was decreased by about 50% in the presence of chloroquine (100 micrograms/ml) or mefloquine (10 micrograms/ml). The three antimalarial drugs altered neutrophil oxidative metabolism as assessed by luminol-amplified chemiluminescence. The strongest effect was observed with mefloquine, which abolished almost completely the neutrophil burst at concentrations of greater than 10 micrograms/ml whatever the stimulus used. This effect was not reversed by washing. Chloroquine and amodiaquine also impaired this PMN response by approximately 80 and 50%, respectively, but only at the highest concentration used (100 micrograms/ml). In the case of amodiaquine, the neutrophil response was restored by washing, except for stimulation with opsonized particles. After washing, the depressive effect of chloroquine was reversed completely in the case of phorbol myristate acetate stimulation and partly in the case of opsonized particle stimulation, but the formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-induced response was not restored. These data show that although they are structurally related, amodiaquine and chloroquine exhibit qualitatively and quantitatively different depressive effects on PMN function and probably interfere at different points of cell activation, although the precise mechanisms are as yet unresolved.

Indexed as

AmodiaquineAntimalarialsCell-Free SystemCell SurvivalChemotaxis, LeukocyteChloroquineHumansMefloquineNeutrophilsOxidation-ReductionPhagocytosisQuinolinesAmodiaquineAntimalarialsChloroquineMefloquineQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID3263835
PMCPMC172363
OpenAlexW2028620480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.