Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638264›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients.

Andrea Vignali, Ugo Elmore, Giovanni Guarneri, Valentino De Ruvo, Paolo Parise, Riccardo Rosati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in elderly patients following multi-level posterior lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea VignaliDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy. vignali.andrea@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-4088
Ugo ElmoreDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-1502
Giovanni GuarneriDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-6932
Valentino De RuvoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.
Paolo PariseDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-4118
Riccardo RosatiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2608-5749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify factors associated with early deviation and delayed discharge within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery and managed with a standardized ERAS pathway between April 2015 and October 2018. ERAS items were assessed within 48 h after surgery. Patients with early complications were excluded. The influence of factors on length of stay was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to model a predicting score. Seven hundred and thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years (P = 0.02), ASA score ≥ 3 (P = 0.03), open surgery or conversion to open (P = 0.001), non-compliance with the intra-operative balanced fluid therapy (P = 0.049), failure to early removal of the urinary catheter (P = 0.001), to discontinue IV fluid (P = 0.02) and to early mobilization (P = 0.001) were independently associated with ERAS failure. The generated score had a specificity of 84% and a positive predictive value of 72%. Patients who would have a length of stay longer than the median for each surgical procedure were properly identified (Area under ROC Curve = 0.753, P < 0.001). The delayed discharge could be predicted at 48 h from the intervention. The ability of the model to weight the specific role of each statistically significant variable might be a useful tool to identify the most frail patients.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonColonic DiseasesFemaleFrailtyHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRecovery of FunctionAdherenceColonERASLaparoscopyRectumSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.