ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Impact of the longitudinal quantitative assessment of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus severity on the disease outcome.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study on juvenile SLE patients aimed to evaluate retrospectively the impact of a tertiary center's management policy of the disease severity on its long-term progression and cumulative damage development as well as provision of quality-driven medical care (QmC).
methodsDisease activity was assessed by the Physician Global Assessment and SLEDAI-2K, flares by SELENA/SLEDAI, and damage by the pediatric SLICC/DI at diagnosis, 6 months post-diagnosis, and annually thereafter. At the same time, QmC was evaluated by relevant indices and quality of life was captured by the Greek version of the General Health Questionnaire only at the last visit.
resultsA total of 35 patients (25/35 females) aged at diagnosis 5.5-15.16 years (median 11.83) with a median lag time to diagnosis 1.8 months had a follow-up of 5 (35/35) and 10 years (13/35), respectively. The predominant baseline manifestations were consistent with those previously reported. Out of 35 patients, 24 (68.5%) were clinically inactive at year 5, and 5/13 (38%) at year 10. All patients received immunosuppressives and 7/35 biologics in addition. At the end of their follow-up, damage was found in 9/35 patients, but none of them had a neuropsychiatric disorder. Over the study, 28/35 patients were compliant with the QmC recommendations.
conclusionsAn early diagnosis combined with a longitudinal quantitative assessment of the disease activity and severity contributes to the continuous evaluation of the disease state. They are the key determinants for the selection of an early, targeted, and personalized management; they restrict the cumulative damage development and contribute to an optimal outcome. Key Points • Juvenile SLE has a heavier introductory profile than in adults and an unpredictable trajectory. • The application of contemporary metric tools for assessing the disease state leads to an objective assessment and regimen selection. • An early diagnosis combined with longitudinal quantitative assessment is a key determinant for an optimal management and a minimal damage development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.