Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638176›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2020

A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum.

Ramona Schweyen, Bilal Al-Nawas, Christin Arnold, Jeremias Hey

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramona SchweyenUniversitätspoliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112, Halle, Saale, Germany. ramona.schweyen@medizin.uni-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-5243
Bilal Al-NawasUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Plastische Operationen, Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christin ArnoldUniversitätspoliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112, Halle, Saale, Germany.
Jeremias HeyUniversitätspoliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 16, 06112, Halle, Saale, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to the importance of theoretical and practical implant dentistry teaching content in undergraduate dental education. The specific objective was to determine whether a consensus could be found concerning aspects of theoretical knowledge, implant position planning, implantation, prosthetic treatment procedures, postoperative care, and prerequisite experiences that should be provided in undergraduate dental education.

resultsA positive consensus existed in terms of theoretical education, assistance in surgical and prosthodontic procedures, implant planning and restoration in straightforward cases (i.e., posterior single crowns and bridges, overdentures on nonconnected implants), and postoperative care. A negative consensus existed for bone augmentation. Implantation was supported by novices (i.e., students and graduates). In addition, more experienced dentists were more likely to oppose implantation performed by undergraduates. The most preferred implantation method was implant insertion using a digitally fabricated drilling template, after surgical flap elevation.

conclusionsStudents and graduates preferred a comprehensive undergraduate education that included implant dentistry. Dentists working in private practice, and especially dentists working as university educators, were critical towards the integration of implant-related learning content into undergraduate education. The intention of medical education is to impart knowledge to students and to prepare them for life-long learning and continual professional development after graduation. Thus, an undergraduate dental curriculum that provides students a solid introduction and knowledge foundation in implant dentistry is recommended.

Indexed as

Dental curriculumImplant dentistryLearning objectiveUndergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID32638176
PMCPMC7340723
OpenAlexW3041980921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.