Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638107›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2020

Impact of COVID-19 on U.S. and Canadian neurologists' therapeutic approach to multiple sclerosis: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Farrah J Mateen, Shawheen Rezaei, Nicholas Alakel, Brittany Gazdag, Aditya Ravi Kumar, Andre Vogel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Multiple Sclerosis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Description and preliminary experience with Virtual Visit Assessment (ViVA) during the COVID-19 pandemic, a structured virtual management protocol for patients with multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Characteristics of COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farrah J MateenDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Office 627, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. fmateen@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4293-8115
Shawheen RezaeiDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Office 627, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Nicholas AlakelZoomRx, Boston, USA.
Brittany GazdagZoomRx, Boston, USA.
Aditya Ravi KumarZoomRx, Boston, USA.
Andre VogelDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Office 627, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report the understanding and decision-making of neuroimmunologists and their treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) during the early stages of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak.

methodsA survey instrument was designed and distributed online to neurologists in April 2020.

resultsThere were 250 respondents (response rate 21.8%). 243 saw >  = 10 MS patients in the prior 6 months (average 197 patients) and were analyzed further (92% USA, 8% Canada; average practice duration 16 years; 5% rural, 17% small city, 38% large city, 40% highly urbanized). Patient volume dropped an average of 79% (53-11 per month). 23% were aware of patients self-discontinuing a DMT due to fear of COVID-19 with 43% estimated to be doing so against medical advice. 65% of respondents reported deferring >  = 1 doses of a DMT (49%), changing the dosing interval (34%), changing to home infusions (20%), switching a DMT (9%), and discontinuing DMTs altogether (8%) as a result of COVID-19. Changes in DMTs were most common with the high-efficacy therapies alemtuzumab, cladribine, ocrelizumab, rituximab, and natalizumab. 35% made no changes to DMT prescribing. 98% expressed worry about their patients contracting COVID-19 and 78% expressed the same degree of worry about themselves.  > 50% believed high-efficacy DMTs prolong viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 and that B-cell therapies might prevent protective vaccine effects. Accelerated pace of telemedicine and practice model changes were identified as major shifts in practice.

conclusionsReported prescribing changes and practice disruptions due to COVID-19 may be temporary but could have a lasting influence on MS care.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Patterns, Physicians'BetacoronavirusCanadaCOVID-19Drug SubstitutionHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunologic FactorsMultiple SclerosisNeurologistsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesImmunologic FactorsCOVID-19Disease-modifying therapyHealth behaviorsImmunosuppressionMultiple sclerosisNeuroimmunologyNeurologist

Identifiers

PMID32638107
PMCPMC7339100
OpenAlexW3038240726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.