Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638091›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Appendicular neoplasms and consequences in patients undergoing surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.

M D M Bolmers, J de Jonge, C C van Rossem, A A W van Geloven, W A Bemelman, Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study group

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CT of acute abdomen in the elderly.Insights into imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. High Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in the Elderly: A Critical Concern for Non-Surgical Treatment.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M D M BolmersDepartment of surgery, Tergooi Hospital Hilversum, P.O. Box 10016, 1201 DA, Hilversum, The Netherlands. mdmbolmers@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-3576
J de JongeDepartment of surgery, Tergooi Hospital Hilversum, P.O. Box 10016, 1201 DA, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
C C van RossemDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A A W van GelovenDepartment of surgery, Tergooi Hospital Hilversum, P.O. Box 10016, 1201 DA, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study group
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLTergooi · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn patients treated with an appendectomy for acute appendicitis, the specimen is generally sent for histological evaluation. In an era of increasing non-operative treatment for acute appendicitis, it is important to know the incidence, the diagnostic accuracy, and treatment consequences of appendicular neoplasms that are found in acute appendicitis. We hypothesize that pre- and intra-operative parameters might predict an appendicular neoplasm.

methodsData was used from our previous prospective observational cohort study. All patients undergoing surgery for suspected acute appendicitis were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of appendicular neoplasms in patients operated for acute appendicitis. Secondary outcomes were pre-operative diagnostics and imaging outcomes, intra-operative surgical judgment, and postoperative management and outcome. Possible predictors of an appendicular neoplasm were identified and used in multivariable logistic regression. Patients with an appendicular neoplasm were followed for 3 years after initial appendectomy.

resultsA total of 1975 patients underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis and in 98.3% (1941/1975) the appendix was removed. In 1.5% (30/1941) of these patients, an appendicular neoplasm was found. Among the malignant neoplasms, the majority were grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (NET) in 65% (13/20). On pre-operative imaging, there was no suspicion of malignancy. In three cases, there was an intra-operative suspicion of malignancy. Multivariable analysis showed only age as an independent predictor for appendicular neoplasms. No recurrent or new malignancy was found during follow-up. DISCUSSION: The incidence of appendicular neoplasm in patients undergoing an acute appendectomy is very low and clinical risk factors could not be identified.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAppendixLaparoscopyNeuroendocrine TumorsAcute DiseaseAppendectomyHumansProspective StudiesAcute appendicitisAppendixNeuroendocrine tumors (NET)

Identifiers

PMID32638091
PMCPMC7541364
OpenAlexW3040960841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.