ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021
ICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified?
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- EAES Clinical Practice Guideline 2026 Protocol: Multi-Society Recommendations for the Treatment of Achalasia.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- European Association of Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Protocol: Evidence-Informed Recommendations on the Management of Cholecystitis With ESAIC and ESR Participation.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Summary Guidelines on the Use of AI in Manuscript Preparation.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Experience and awareness of research integrity among Japanese physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32638072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.