Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2021
Electroacupuncture for balanced mixed urinary incontinence: secondary analysis of a randomized non-inferiority controlled trial.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acupuncture for treating overactive bladder in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) in women with balanced mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) compared with PFMT plus solifenacin.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial. Seventy-nine patients with balanced MUI were randomly assigned to receive either 12-week EA with 24-week follow-up or 36-week PFMT and solifenacin. Primary outcome was the proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction of mean 24-h incontinence episode frequency (IFE) through weeks 1-12 from baseline. Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat population using a generalized linear model with a binomial distribution, adjusted for imbalances in baseline variables, and a two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsA total of 34 participants in the EA group and 45 participants in the PFMT plus solifenacin group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of primary outcome. Through weeks 1-12, the proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction of mean 24-h IEF was 32.4% in the EA group, and 37.2% in the PFMT plus solifenacin group, with a mean difference of -2.82% (95%CI: -23.88 to 18.23, p=0.79), revealing non-inferiority. No significant difference held true for all the secondary outcomes. Six adverse events occurred in the EA group and 22 in the PEMT plus solifenacin group.
conclusionsThe effect of EA is similar to PFMT plus solifenacin in relieving the symptoms of both SUI and UUI and increasing participants' quality of life but with better safety. The effects of EA may sustain 24 weeks after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.