Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638040›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial-PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11).

Carolin Zimmermann, Marius Distler, Christina Jentsch, Sophia Blum, Gunnar Folprecht, Klaus Zöphel, Heike Polster, Esther G C Troost, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Jürgen Weitz and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05729737 (Prediction and Evaluation of Chemotherapy Treatment Response Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Unresected Localized Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05729737 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prediction and Evaluation of Chemotherapy Treatment Response Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Unresected Localized Pancreatic Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Ultrasonography, First-line ChemotherapyArmsContrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Carolin ZimmermannDepartment of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. carolin.zimmermann@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-7980
Marius DistlerDepartment of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Christina JentschNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sophia BlumDepartment of Radiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Gunnar FolprechtNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus ZöphelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbh, Chemnitz, Germany.
Heike PolsterDepartment of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Esther G C TroostNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Nasreddin AbolmaaliDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzDepartment of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Michael BaumannNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Detlev SaegerDepartment of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Robert GrützmannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEHeidelberg University · DEHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DEKlinikum Chemnitz · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of 20-25%. As approximately only 20% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are initially staged as resectable, it is necessary to evaluate new therapeutic approaches. Hence, neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic option, especially in patients with a borderline resectable tumor. The aim of this non-randomized, monocentric, prospective, phase II clinical study was to assess the prognostic value of functional imaging techniques, i.e., [

methodsPatients with histologically proven resectable, borderline resectable or unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and DW-MRI including T1- and T2-weighted sequences prior to and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as following induction radiochemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the response as quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) measured with FDG-PET. Response to treatment was evaluated by FDG-PET and DW-MRI during and after the neoadjuvant course. Morphologic staging was performed using contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI to decide inclusion of patients and resectability after neoadjuvant therapy. In those patients undergoing subsequent surgery, imaging findings were correlated with those of the pathologic resection specimen.

resultsA total of 25 patients were enrolled in the study. The response rate measured by FDG-PET was 85% with a statistically significant decrease of the maximal SUV (SUV

conclusionBased on these limited patient numbers, it was possible to show that this trial design is feasible and that the neoadjuvant therapy regime was well tolerated. FDG-PET/CT may be a reliable method to evaluate response to the combined therapy. In contrast, when evaluating the response using mean ADC, DW-MRI did not show conclusive results.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChemotherapy, AdjuvantDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18GemcitabineHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleDeoxycytidineFluorine-18Fluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18GemcitabineOxaliplatinRadiopharmaceuticalsDownstagingImagingNeoadjuvant radio-/chemotherapyPancreas cancerPancreatic adenocarcinomaPDACSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32638040
PMCPMC7801319
OpenAlexW3039509092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.