Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32638031›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020

[Sucrose octasulfate-evidence in the treatment of chronic wounds].

Joachim Dissemond, Matthias Augustin, Michael Dietlein, Winfried Keuthage, Severin Läuchli, Ralf Lobmann, Karl-Christian Münter, Markus Stücker, Jürg Traber, Wolfgang Vanscheidt and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Joachim DissemondKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. joachim.dissemond@uk-essen.de.
Matthias AugustinInstitut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Michael DietleinDiabetesschwerpunktpraxis Dietlein, Bauernstr. 50, 86391, Stadtbergen, Deutschland.
Winfried KeuthageSchwerpunktpraxis Diabetes und Ernährungsmedizin, MedicalCenter am Clemenshospital, Düesbergweg 128, 48153, Münster, Deutschland.
Severin LäuchliDermatologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Gloriastr. 31, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
Ralf LobmannKlinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Geriatrie, Klinikum Stuttgart - Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt, Prießnitzweg 24, 70374, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Karl-Christian MünterGemeinschaftspraxis Bramfeld, Bramfelder Chaussee 200, 22177, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Markus StückerAbteilung für Dermatologie und Venerologie, LKH Feldkirch, Akademisches Lehrspital, Carinagasse 45-47, 6800, Feldkirch, Österreich.
Jürg TraberAbteilung für Dermatologie Venerologie und Allergologie am St. Josef-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
Wolfgang VanscheidtVenenklinik Bellevue, Brückenstr. 9, 8280, Kreuzlingen, Schweiz.
Robert StrohalDermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Paula-Modersohn-Platz 3, 79100, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Clemenshospital Münster · DEDiabetesinstitut Heidelberg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DELandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATPraxis für Humangenetik · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with chronic wounds should receive wound treatment in addition to causative therapy. In this context, the lack of adequate evidence for wound healing products has been repeatedly discussed. Using the example of TLC-sucrose octasulfate (TLC: technology lipido-colloid), the present review shows that there is significant data with good evidence and comparability in this area. One therapeutic approach to promote wound healing is the inhibition of matrix-metalloproteinases, for example by sucrose octasulfate. For wound products containing TLC-sucrose octasulfate, several sequential clinical studies have been conducted in recent years. The WHAT study was an open randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 117 patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU). The CHALLENGE study was a double-blind RCT with 187 patients with VLU. The SPID study was a pilot study with 33 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). The two prospective, multicenter clinical pilot studies NEREIDES and CASSIOPEE examined a total of 88 patients with VLU in different phases of healing. In the REALITY study, a pooled data analysis was performed on eight observational studies with 10,220 patients with chronic wounds of different genesis. In the double-blind, two-armed EXPLORER RCT, 240 patients with neuro-ischemic DFU were followed from first presentation until complete healing. In all studies, a significant promotion of wound healing could be shown by the use of wound healing products with TLC-sucrose octasulfate.

Indexed as

Anti-Ulcer AgentsHumansSucroseVaricose UlcerWound HealingAnti-Ulcer AgentsSucrosesucrose octasulfateEvidence-based wound careNano-oligosaccharide factorTLC-sucrose octasulfateWound healingWound healing products

Identifiers

PMID32638031
OpenAlexW3041392258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.