Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637991›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2020

Contributions of Liquid-Based (Papanicolaou) Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cotesting for Detection of Cervical Cancer and Precancer in the United States.

Harvey W Kaufman, Damian P Alagia, Zhen Chen, Agnieszka Onisko, R Marshall Austin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative Oncologic Outcomes in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive and -Negative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of the SureXFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Areas.Annals of global health · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cervical Screening Performance.American journal of clinical pathology · 2021
    Article
  16. Cotesting in Cervical Cancer Screening.American journal of clinical pathology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harvey W KaufmanQuest Diagnostics, Secaucus, NJ.
Damian P AlagiaQuest Diagnostics, Secaucus, NJ.
Zhen ChenQuest Diagnostics, Secaucus, NJ.
Agnieszka OniskoFaculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland.
R Marshall AustinDepartment of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Quest Diagnostics (United States) · USBialystok University of Technology · PLMagee-Womens Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven the recent debate challenging the contribution of cytology in cervical screening, we evaluated results of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in cotesting preceding cervical cancer (CxCa) and precancer diagnoses in a national, heterogeneous population.

methodsWe assessed the results of cotesting, performed by Quest Diagnostics, in 13,633,071 women 30 years and older, tested 2010 to 2018. Cotest results preceding CxCa or precancer diagnoses were analyzed and stratified by histopathology.

resultsAmong all screening results, 1,615 cotests preceded 1,259 CxCa diagnoses, and 11,164 cotests preceded 8,048 cervical precancer diagnoses. More women who were subsequently diagnosed with CxCa within 1 year were identified by the LBC result than by the HPV result (85.1%, 1,015/1,193 vs 77.5%, 925/1,193). Among all women with CxCa, the overall rate of nondetection was 13.1% (212/1,615) for cotesting results (LBC negative/HPV negative) and this rate increased substantially when testing exceeded 12 months compared to within 1 year prediagnosis of either CxCa or precancer.

conclusionsAnalysis of 9-year cotest results from a national reference laboratory confirms the value of LBC element in cotesting. This supports that LBC/HPV cotesting enhances screening for the identification of CxCa in women 30 years and older, more so than LBC or HPV alone within cotesting.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPapillomavirus InfectionsUnited StatesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsCervical cancer screeningCotestingRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32637991
PMCPMC7523581
OpenAlexW3041864851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.