Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637941›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2019

Fusion in Breast Cancer Histology Classification.

Juan Vizcarra, Ryan Place, Li Tong, David Gutman, May D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Generating Region of Interests for Invasive Breast Cancer in Histopathological Whole-Slide-Image.Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan VizcarraDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Ryan PlaceSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Li TongDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332.
David GutmanDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
May D WangDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332.

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a deadly disease that affects millions of women worldwide. The International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition in 2018 presents the BreAst Cancer Histology (ICIAR2018 BACH) image data challenge that calls for computer tools to assist pathologists and doctors in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer subtypes. Using the BACH dataset, we have developed an image classification pipeline that combines both a shallow learner (support vector machine) and a deep learner (convolutional neural network). The shallow learner and deep learners achieved moderate accuracies of 79% and 81% individually. When being integrated by fusion algorithms, the system outperformed any individual learner with the highest accuracy as 92%. The fusion presents big potential for improving clinical design support.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningFusionHistologysupport vector machinesSURF

Identifiers

PMID32637941
PMCPMC7339913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.