Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637935›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Artificial intelligence in luminal endoscopy.

Shraddha Gulati, Andrew Emmanuel, Mehul Patel, Sophie Williams, Amyn Haji, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Helmut Neumann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  3. Endoscopic appearances of gastric mucosa in different endoscopic models according to H. pylori infection status.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Video Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shraddha GulatiKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1394-011X
Andrew EmmanuelKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mehul PatelKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sophie WilliamsKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Amyn HajiKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bu'Hussain HayeeKing's Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helmut NeumannDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-405X
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is a strong focus of interest for global health development. Diagnostic endoscopy is an attractive substrate for artificial intelligence with a real potential to improve patient care through standardisation of endoscopic diagnosis and to serve as an adjunct to enhanced imaging diagnosis. The possibility to amass large data to refine algorithms makes adoption of artificial intelligence into global practice a potential reality. Initial studies in luminal endoscopy involve machine learning and are retrospective. Improvement in diagnostic performance is appreciable through the adoption of deep learning. Research foci in the upper gastrointestinal tract include the diagnosis of neoplasia, including Barrett's, squamous cell and gastric where prospective and real-time artificial intelligence studies have been completed demonstrating a benefit of artificial intelligence-augmented endoscopy. Deep learning applied to small bowel capsule endoscopy also appears to enhance pathology detection and reduce capsule reading time. Prospective evaluation including the first randomised trial has been performed in the colon, demonstrating improved polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, these appear to be relevant to small polyps. There are potential additional roles of artificial intelligence relevant to improving the quality of endoscopic examinations, training and triaging of referrals. Further large-scale, multicentre and cross-platform validation studies are required for the robust incorporation of artificial intelligence-augmented diagnostic luminal endoscopy into our routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

AIendoscopyimaging

Identifiers

PMID32637935
PMCPMC7315657
OpenAlexW3037344539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.