ArticleACS omega2020
Study on In Situ Catalytic Cracking of Coal Tar by Plasma Preparation of the Pyrolysis Coke Catalyst.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A two-stage pyrolysis fixed bed was used, and the vapor-modified pyrolysis coke was used as a carrier. A ZHPC catalyst was prepared by plasma calcination. Gas-phase tar produced by the pyrolysis of raw coal was subjected to in situ catalytic cracking to improve tar and gas yield. The effects of plasma calcination power, calcination time, and ZnO loading on in situ cracked products were studied. The prepared catalyst was characterized by X-ray electron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller, and scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that (1) compared with traditional catalysts, the catalyst prepared by plasma has better performance; (2) the optimal calcination time of the ZHPC catalyst is 5 min, calcination power is 60 W, and ZnO loading is 10%; (3) compared with raw coal pyrolysis, the optimal ZHPC catalyst on in situ catalytic cracking tar, gas yield increased by 66.16%; the cracking rate of tar increased by 54.46%, and the content of light components increased to 60.7%; (4) in situ catalytic cracking of tar with the optimal PC, the light tar has been greatly improved, in which the light oil, phenol oil, naphthalene oil, and wash oil have increased by 93.04, 126.31, 257.28, and 108.08%, respectively. The anthracene oil and asphalt have decreased by 26.98 and 58.71%; the tar cracking rate has increased.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.