ArticleHeliyon2020
Occurrence and probabilistic risk assessment of PAHs in water and sediment samples of the Diep River, South Africa.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seasonal variations, source apportionment, and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments from Klip River, Johannesburg, South Africa.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Article
- An extensive investigation on human risk associated with PAHs in fish and sediment in Bushehr, Northern of Persian Gulf.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Importance of Fostering and Funding Scientific Research, and its Relevance to Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Occurrence and probabilistic risk assessment of PAHs in water and sediment samples of the Diep River, South Africa.Heliyon · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and sediment samples of the Diep River freshwater system of Western Cape Province, South Africa. A solid-phase extraction - gas chromatography - flame ionisation detection (SPE-GC-FID) method was utilised to simultaneously determine the 16 United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) listed priority PAHs in water and sediment samples. The seasonal averages of individual PAH detected at the studied sites, ranged between not detected (Nd) and 72.38 ± 9.58 μg/L in water samples and between Nd and 16.65 ± 2.63 μg/g in the corresponding sediment samples. The levels of PAHs measured in water and sediment samples were subjected to probabilistic risk assessment to predict the possibility of regulatory values being exceeded. The average percentage exceedence of 63.26 was obtained for PAHs in water samples of the Diep River, while the corresponding average percentage exceedence obtained for sediment sample was 63.71. Sufficient exposure of humans and aquatic organisms to the exceedance levels obtained, would cause adverse health effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.