ArticleeNeurologicalSci2020
A pediatric neurobehavioral treatment challenge.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recommendations on Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatric Guidelines.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tourette 's syndrome (TS) currently has very limited FDA approved treatment options, despite the fact that TS and other pediatric tic disorders are not uncommon and can cause significant emotional and physical distress for patients and their families. For providers who regularly see these conditions in practice this inadequacy is highly frustrating on the treatment side as there are such limited options to offer to these families, and the outcome to hope for is not highly optimistic. The outcome of this case presentation is an example of how health care providers can use clinical knowledge in combination with evidence-based practice to advocate for their patients and find new solutions that could be, and in this case were, life changing. It promotes providers to advocate for their patients and expand their knowledge. The final medication treatment utilized in this case is currently off label, however the method of finding and obtaining the treatment explained in the case additionally reveal to readers how to cautiously but judiciously make off label treatment decisions that can be important to practice and patient outcomes. In the course of this case the off-label medication use decision was backed by scientific literature and ongoing FDA studies as well as consulting with a collaborating psychiatrist. The subject matter and method of reasoning within this case also promote psychiatric providers use of evidence-based practice and implementation of science into active practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.