Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637639›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Development of a Hybrid, Interprofessional, Interactive Quality Improvement Curriculum as a Model for Continuing Professional Development.

Isabelle S Kusters, Megan E Gregory, Jennifer L Bryan, Sylvia J Hysong, LeChauncy D Woodard, Aanand D Naik, Kyler M Godwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabelle S KustersDepartment of Clinical, Health, and Applied Sciences, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-748X
Megan E GregoryDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jennifer L BryanDepartment of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sylvia J HysongDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
LeChauncy D WoodardDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Aanand D NaikCenter for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kyler M GodwinDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there has been an increased focus on quality improvement (QI) in health care, which is critical in achieving care that is patient-centered, safer, timelier, and more effective, efficient, and equitable. At the center of this movement is QI education, which is known to lead to learning, behavior change, and improved outcomes. However, there is a need for the development and provision of long-duration, interactive, interprofessional training in QI, to allow for in-depth learning and application of learned skills. To this end, we designed a curriculum for an established interprofessional, interactive, web-based QI fellowship for doctorally prepared clinicians. Curricular content is delivered virtually to geographically dispersed learners over a 2-year time span. The didactic curriculum and experiential learning opportunities provide learners with the foundational knowledge and practical skills to engage in-and eventually, lead-QI initiatives around the country. Evaluation of learner satisfaction and cognitive, affective, and skills-based learning has found that this model is an effective method to train geographically distributed learners. A hybrid training structure is used, where learners interact with the material through 3 distinct delivery modes: (1) virtual instruction in QI topics; (2) face-to-face training, mentorship, and the opportunity for practical application of applied knowledge and skills through the completion of QI projects; and (3) opportunities for other types of training, tailored to each learner's Individual Development Plan. This training program model holds value for QI learning in various health care settings, which are interprofessional by nature. These foundational concepts of hybrid learning to distributed learners-wherein an instructor delivers curriculum in small, face-to-face batches, interprofessional learning is supplemented in a virtual, longitudinal manner, and learners are allowed the opportunity to put skills into action for real-world problems in interdisciplinary clinical teams-can be applied in a multitude of settings, with comparatively lower time and cost expenditure than traditional training programs.

Indexed as

curriculumhybrid trainingQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32637639
PMCPMC7322816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.