ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020
Treatment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in high-level athletes.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- Identification of characteristics of patients who choose operative versus non-operative management after ACL injury: a latent class analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2025Article
- Treatment Decision-Making for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture From the Perspective of Physical Therapists in Australia: A Mixed Methods Study.Physical therapy · 2025Article
- Steeper tibial and meniscal slopes as predictive factors for ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An ultrastructure analysis of the developing human anterior cruciate ligament tibial enthesis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Article
- The Clinical Utility of Thigh Circumferential Measurement in Association with Quadriceps Limb Symmetry.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- The Double-Edged Sword: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions on Adolescent Patients-Growth Plate Surgical Challenges and Future Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Oh, My Quad: A Clinical Commentary And Evidence-Based Framework for the Rehabilitation of Quadriceps Size and Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Standardized Opioid Counseling Is Underperformed Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Management after acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Part 1: ACL reconstruction has a protective effect on secondary meniscus and cartilage lesions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Review
- A systematic review of transphyseal ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Symptomatic tibial tunnel ganglion cyst presenting four years following an ACL hamstring autograft reconstruction: a case report of a rare complication of ACL surgery.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2022Article
- Trends in Primary Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Practice in Adult Patients Prevalent Among Arthroscopy Surgeons of Six Southern States of India.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Is Lever Test Superior to Lachman, Pivot Shift, Drawer Tests in Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries?Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best-practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative versus nonoperative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to report the consensus statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. There were 66 international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, who were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the scientific organizing committee and session chairs for the 3 working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements before the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Ultimately, 80% agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the symposium. Overall, 9 statements achieved unanimous support, 2 reached strong consensus, 1 did not achieve consensus, and 1 was removed because of redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended because of the high risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight-plane activities, nonoperative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and nonoperative treatment with patients after an ACL injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.