Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637434›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Treatment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B Rothrauff, Lars Engebretsen, Andrew D Lynch, Olufemi R Ayeni, Mark V Paterno, John W Xerogeanes, Freddie H Fu, Jon Karlsson, Volker Musahl and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An ultrastructure analysis of the developing human anterior cruciate ligament tibial enthesis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa DiermeierInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benjamin B RothrauffInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lars EngebretsenInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrew D LynchInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Olufemi R AyeniInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark V PaternoInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
John W XerogeanesInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Freddie H FuInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jon KarlssonInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Volker MusahlInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group
Charles H BrownInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Terese L ChmielewskiInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark ClatworthyInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stefano Della VillaInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lucio ErnlundInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christian FinkInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alan GetgoodInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Timothy E HewettInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yasuyuki IshibashiInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Darren L JohnsonInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey A MacalenaInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert G MarxInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jacques MenetreyInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sean J MeredithInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kentaro OnishiInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas RauerInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benjamin B RothrauffInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura C SchmittInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Romain SeilInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric H SenorskiInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rainer SieboldInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lynn Snyder-MacklerInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tim SpaldingInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eleonore SvantessonInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin E WilkInvestigation performed at University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment strategies for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to evolve. Evidence supporting best-practice guidelines for the management of ACL injury is to a large extent based on studies with low-level evidence. An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions regarding the best available evidence on operative versus nonoperative treatment for ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to report the consensus statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injuries developed at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium 2019. There were 66 international experts on the management of ACL injuries, representing 18 countries, who were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Proposed consensus statements were drafted by the scientific organizing committee and session chairs for the 3 working groups. Panel participants reviewed preliminary statements before the meeting and provided initial agreement and comments on the statement via online survey. During the meeting, discussion and debate occurred for each statement, after which a final vote was then held. Ultimately, 80% agreement was defined a priori as consensus. A total of 11 of 13 statements on operative versus nonoperative treatment of ACL injury reached consensus during the symposium. Overall, 9 statements achieved unanimous support, 2 reached strong consensus, 1 did not achieve consensus, and 1 was removed because of redundancy in the information provided. In highly active patients engaged in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports, early anatomic ACL reconstruction is recommended because of the high risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage injuries with delayed surgery, although a period of progressive rehabilitation to resolve impairments and improve neuromuscular function is recommended. For patients who seek to return to straight-plane activities, nonoperative treatment with structured, progressive rehabilitation is an acceptable treatment option. However, with persistent functional instability, or when episodes of giving way occur, anatomic ACL reconstruction is indicated. The consensus statements derived from international leaders in the field will assist clinicians in deciding between operative and nonoperative treatment with patients after an ACL injury.

Indexed as

ACL injuryACL reconstructionnonoperative treatment

Identifiers

PMID32637434
PMCPMC7315684
OpenAlexW3037416089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.