Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32637247›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2020

Tomographic STED microscopy.

Jennifer-Rose Krüger, Jan Keller-Findeisen, Claudia Geisler, Alexander Egner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer-Rose KrügerDepartment of Optical Nanoscopy, Laser-Laboratory Göttingen e.V., Hans-Adolf-Krebs-Weg 1, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Jan Keller-FindeisenDepartment of NanoBiophotonics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Claudia GeislerDepartment of Optical Nanoscopy, Laser-Laboratory Göttingen e.V., Hans-Adolf-Krebs-Weg 1, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander EgnerDepartment of Optical Nanoscopy, Laser-Laboratory Göttingen e.V., Hans-Adolf-Krebs-Weg 1, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-3858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is a versatile imaging method with diffraction-unlimited resolution. Here, we present a novel STED microscopy variant that achieves either increased resolution at equal laser power or identical super-resolution conditions at significantly lower laser power when compared to the classical implementation. By applying a one-dimensional depletion pattern instead of the well-known doughnut-shaped STED focus, a more efficient depletion is achieved, thereby necessitating less STED laser power to achieve identical resolution. A two-dimensional resolution increase is obtained by recording a sequence of images with different high-resolution directions. This corresponds to a collection of tomographic projections within diffraction-limited spots, an approach that so far has not been explored in super-resolution microscopy. Via appropriate reconstruction algorithms, our method also provides an opportunity to speed up the acquisition process. Both aspects, the necessity of less STED laser power and the feasibility to decrease the recording time, have the potential to reduce photo-bleaching as well as sample damage drastically.

Identifiers

PMID32637247
PMCPMC7316010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.